Brazilian presidential election, 1989
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 88.08% (first round) 85.61% (second round) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is part of a series on the |
Presidential elections were held in Brazil in 1989, with the first round on November 15 and a second round on December 17. They were the first direct presidential elections since 1960, the first to be held using a two-round system and the first to take place under the 1988 constitution, which followed two decades of authoritarian rule after the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état.
The collapse of the military-imposed two-party system[1] that pitted the right-wing authoritarian National Renewal Alliance (ARENA) against the catch-all Brazilian Democratic Movement (MDB) resulted in a wide array of new parties seeking to fill the political vacuum. President José Sarney of the PMDB, the MBD's successor, was ineligible to run. Sarney, who was elected Vice President on Tancredo Neves's ticket in the 1985 elections, had taken office due to Neves's death before his scheduled inauguration.[2]
Popular Governor of Alagoas Fernando Collor de Mello resigned from his position to mount a bid for the presidency.[3] Previously a member of the PMDB, Collor joined the small National Reconstruction Party (PRN) in the run-up to the presidential campaign. Collor, who presented himself as a political outsider and was noted for his charisma,[4] polled at a mere 5% according to polling taken in early 1989.[5] Collor's emergence as an unlikely frontrunner was credited to his campaign's skilled use of television advertisements to make the case for his candidacy.[6] Collor, who had governed one of the smallest states in the country, chose Senator Itamar Franco of the populous and electorally crucial state of Minas Gerais as his running mate.[7] Further, Collor's campaign was noted for his relative youth at the mere age of 40.[8]
Following the end of state repression of socialist parties, the Brazilian Left faced a fractured field defined by two primary candidates: Popular labour leader Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula, of the industrial ABC Region of São Paulo,[9] and Leonel Brizola, a longtime staple of the Brazilian Left who had served as Governor of Rio Grande do Sul prior to the 1964 military coup.[10] Lula was widely known in Brazil for his role leading the highly publicized metalworkers' strike in the State of São Paulo during the late 1970s[11] and had been elected a federal deputy in 1986 with the most votes nationwide.[12] Lula ran as a member of the Workers' Party (PT), a left-wing party he helped found in 1980. For his running mate, Lula chose Senator José Paulo Bisol of Rio Grande do Sul, a member of the Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), to unite the left. In the first round, Lula narrowly defeated Brizola, who was running as a member of the Brazilian Labour Party (PDT), for a position in the runoff.[13]
The general election was marked by negative campaigning, with Collor accusing Lula of supporting divisive class struggle.[14] The role of Rede Globo, the largest and most-watched TV network in Brazil, in Collor's election remains controversial.[15][6] Following a tumultuous election cycle, Collor defeated Lula to become the first directly elected President of Brazil in almost thirty years. Collor would later resign from office facing an impending impeachment trial.[16]
Background
On January 15, 1985, following two decades of a US-backed right-wing military dictatorship, in power since the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état, Tancredo Neves of the Brazilian Democratic Movement, the opposition party in a military junta-imposed two-party system, was indirectly elected president by Congress. The government was an authoritarian illiberal democracy which directly elected representatives, but not the president. It was in a process of slow liberalization since the 1974 indirect election of Ernesto Geisel, who was more permissive of political dissent than his hard-liner predecessor, Emílio Garrastazu Médici. Neves was the first civilian to be elected president since 1960.
However, Neves was hospitalized of an untreated cancer on the eve of his inauguration, and finally died in 21 April, before taking office. José Sarney, the Vice-president-elect, was immediately sworn in. The legitimacy of Sarney's appointment was widely questioned,[citation needed] since Neves had died as president-elect without ever taking office. Sarney was seen with suspicion by the civilian population as a member of the military regime's party, the National Renewal Alliance. The support of General Leônidas Pires Gonçalves, slated to be Minister of the Army in Neves' future cabinet, was decisive for Sarney taking office.[citation needed]
Nevertheless, as promised by Neves, Sarney led a transitional government which allowed for liberalization of the authoritarian military government. In 1986, he called for elections to form a constituent assembly, which designed and promulgated the seventh and current constitution of Brazil on October 5, 1988. A markedly liberal democratic and social democratic constitution, it prescribed first-past-the-post two-round direct elections for executive and legislative seats at the federal, state, and municipal levels, and set the date for the 1989 election. It also provided for freedom of expression and legalized formerly clandestine parties such as the Brazilian Communist Party and the Brazilian Socialist Party.
Candidates
Candidates in the runoff
Party | Presidential candidate | Running mate[a] | Coalition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Reconstruction Party |
Fernando Collor Governor of Alagoas (1987–1989) |
Itamar Franco Senator from Minas Gerais |
New Brazil:
| |||
Workers' Party |
Lula da Silva Federal Deputy |
José Paulo Bisol (PSB) Senator from Rio Grande do Sul |
Popular Brazil Front:
|
Candidates not advanced to runoff
Party | Presidential candidate | Running mate[a] | Coalition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazilian Communist Party | Roberto Freire Federal Deputy |
Sérgio Arouca President of Fiocruz (1985–1989) |
— | |||
Brazilian Labour Party |
Affonso Camargo Netto Senator from Paraná |
José Roberto Faria Lima | — | |||
Brazilian Municipalist Party |
Armando Corrêa President of the party |
Agostinho Linhares | — | |||
Brazilian People's Party |
Antônio Pedreira President of the party |
Orestes Ferreira Alves | — | |||
Brazilian Social Democracy Party |
Mário Covas Senator from São Paulo |
Almir Gabriel Senator from Pará |
— | |||
Democratic Labour Party |
Leonel Brizola Governor of Rio de Janeiro (1983–1987) |
Fernando Lyra Federal Deputy |
— | |||
Democratic Social Party |
Paulo Maluf Governor of São Paulo (1979–1982) |
Bonifácio de Andrada Federal Deputy |
— | |||
Green Party |
Fernando Gabeira | Maurício Lobo Abreu | — | |||
Liberal Party |
Guilherme Afif Federal Deputy |
Aluísio Pimenta (PDC) | Christian Liberal Alliance:
| |||
National Communitarian Party |
Zamir José Teixeira | William Pereira da Silva President of the party |
— | |||
Nationalist Party | Lívia Maria | Ardwin Retto Grünewald | — | |||
National Mobilization Party | Celso Brant President of the party |
José Natan | — | |||
Party of the Brazilian Democratic Movement |
Ulysses Guimarães Federal Deputy |
Waldir Pires Governor of Bahia (1987–1989) |
— | |||
Party of the Christian Democracy of Brazil | Manoel Horta | Jorge Coelho de Sá | — | |||
Party of the Liberal Front |
Aureliano Chaves Minister of Mines and Energy (1985–1988) |
Cláudio Lembo Secretary of Legal Affairs of São Paulo (1986–1989) |
— | |||
Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order | Enéas Carneiro President of the party |
Lenine Madeira | — | |||
People's Party | Paulo Gontijo President of the party |
Luiz Paulino | — | |||
Progressive Liberal Party | Eudes Mattar | Dante Lazzaroni Júnior | — | |||
Social Democratic Party |
Ronaldo Caiado Leader of the Ruralist Democratic Union |
Camillo Calazans (PDN) | City-Country Union:
| |||
Social Progressive Party |
Marronzinho President of the party |
Reinaldo Valim | — |
Campaign
Most political parties were relatively new but managed to actively mobilise the population,[citation needed] with the election coming five years after massive demonstrations for direct elections in the late 1980s Diretas Já movement had called for the end of the military regime. Sarney was barred by the 1988 constitution from running for immediate reelection as a vice president ascending to the office of president counts as a full term.
Twenty-two candidates entered the race, a record number of candidates in a single presidential election. The 1989 elections were the first in which the president and vice-president were jointly elected as running mates.
Among the twenty-two candidates, only Ulysses Guimarães and Paulo Maluf had previously run for the presidency, although Jânio Quadros planned to run but eventually dropped his candidacy. Aureliano Chaves had also previously served as vice-president. Orestes Quercia, a member of Sarney's Brazilian Democratic Movement, led the polls until he decided to drop out of the contest.[17] TV host Silvio Santos announced he would run just 20 days before the election, but his candidacy was mired in uncertainty and eventually revoked by the Superior Electoral Court because of a technicality.[18]
The first round took place on November 15, 1989, the 100th anniversary of the republican coup which deposed Pedro II of Brazil and proclaimed the First Brazilian Republic. Since no candidate managed to win a majority of votes, a second round was held on December 17, featuring the two top finishers: Fernando Collor de Mello of the economically liberal right-wing populist National Reconstruction Party and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of the social democratic left-wing populist Workers' Party.
Both candidates had a reputation as outsiders. Despite being a charismatic leader, Lula failed to attract the majority of votes from poor, unskilled and semiskilled workers – who would, later on, form the basis of the Workers' Party electorate. These voters predominantly favored Collor, who was associated with the traditional economic elites of northeastern Brazil. Lula's support was greater among progressive intellectuals, Catholic activists, skilled industrial workers, and the college-educated middle class of the South and Southeast, despite himself being a poor immigrant from the Northeast.[citation needed]
Collor argued that Lula's plans of aggressive spending on inequality reduction programs would destroy Brazil's then-fragile economy, harming the poor people he claimed to champion. He also appealed to his young age and distanced himself from the previous military governments, as well as from the newer political elites who had supported the Sarney government and its Plano Cruzado, which had failed to stop hyperinflation.
After Leonel Brizola was defeated in the first round, he supported Lula, with his support being considered crucial to Lula's strong performance in Rio Grande do Sul in the second round.[19]
Ultimately, Collor was elected with a six-point lead. His initial widespread support,[citation needed] based on his strong rhetoric against corruption,[citation needed] quickly vanished[citation needed] in the wake of his 1992 impeachment for corruption charges, leading to Collor resigning from office in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the proceedings. Lula would go on to be elected president for the first time in the 2002 elections, win a second term in the 2006 contest and be elected president for the second time in the 2022 elections. The Workers' Party also won the presidency twice more with Dilma Rousseff, a protégé of Lula, in the 2010 and 2014 elections. The party would remain in power until her impeachment in 2016 and the 2018 election of right-wing populist Jair Bolsonaro.
Debates
First round
Following the first round, Rede Globo aired a debate between Lula and Collor live. During the broadcast of primetime news program Jornal Nacional on the following day, an edited-down highlight reel of the debate was aired. Critics argued that it highlighted Collor's best moments and Lula's worst ones, and that coverage was sympathetical to Collor, who was supposedly close to Globo's CEO Roberto Marinho. The event was explored on the British Channel 4 documentary Beyond Citizen Kane, which features an interview with then head of journalism at Globo, Armando Nogueira, where he says his edit of the debate was edited so as to favor Collor and claims that after complaining to Marinho about the edit, he was dismissed from the company.
Some[who?] attribute Collor's electoral victory to this particular event and other media coverage, such as a Jornal do Brasil article claiming Lula had fathered an illegitimate daughter. Later, Collor's campaign contacted Lula's ex-girlfriend, the mother of the child in question, and claimed that Lula had asked her to perform an abortion. This is said to be compounded by a prohibition on electoral advertising immediately preceding an election, which prevented Lula from responding to the accusations.[citation needed]
The kidnapping of wealthy businessman Abilio Diniz on the day of the election by alleged supporters of PT is believed to have harmed Lula, who was legally forbidden from speaking to the press on election day to disavow the crime due to Brazilian election rules.[20]
A 2023 study found that Rede Globo's media coverage on the eve of the election led Lula to lose millions of votes.[15]
1989 Brazilian presidential election debates | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Date | Hosts | Moderators | Participants | ||||||||||
Key: P Present A Absent O Invited to other debate N Not invited |
PRN | PT | PDT | PSDB | PDS | PL | PMDB | PCB | PFL | PSD | PTB | |||
Collor | Lula | Brizola | Covas | Maluf | Afif | Ulysses | Freire | Chaves | Caiado | Camargo | ||||
1 | Monday, 17 July 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | A | P | P | P | P | P | A | P | P | P | P |
2.1 | Monday, 14 August 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | O | O | P | O | P | P | O | P | P | O | O |
2.2 | Tuesday, 15 August 1989 | A | P | O | P | O | O | P | O | O | P | P | ||
3 | Monday, 16 October 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | A | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | A | P | N |
4 | Sunday, 5 November 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | A | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | A | P | N |
5 | Sunday, 12 November 1989 | SBT | Boris Casoy | A | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | A | P | N |
Second round
1989 Brazilian presidential election debates | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Date | Hosts | Moderators | Participants | |
Key: P Present A Absent |
PRN | PT | |||
Collor | Lula | ||||
1 | Sunday, 3 December 1989 | Rede Manchete | Alexandre Garcia Boris Casoy Eliakim Araújo Marília Gabriela |
P | P |
2 | Thursday, 14 December 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Alexandre Garcia Boris Casoy Eliakim Araújo Marília Gabriela |
P | P |
Opinion polls
First round
Active candidates |
Fernando Collor (PRN) |
Lula (PT) |
Leonel Brizola (PDT) |
Mário Covas (PSDB) |
Paulo Maluf (PDS) |
Afif Domingos (PL) |
Ulysses Guimarães (PMDB) |
Others |
Abstentions/Undecided |
Pollster/client(s) | Date(s) conducted |
Sample size |
Collor PRN |
Lula PT |
Brizola PDT |
Covas PSDB |
Maluf PDS |
Afif PL |
Guimarães PMDB |
Others | Abst. Undec. |
Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1989 election | 15 Nov | – | 30.48% | 17.19% | 16.51% | 11.52% | 8.85% | 4.84% | 4.74% | 5.87% | 6.45% | 13.29% |
Datafolha | 15 Nov[b] | 10,645 | 30% | 18% | 14% | 10% | 8% | 4% | 4% | – | 6% | 12% |
Datafolha | 14 Nov | – | 26% | 15% | 14% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4% | 11% | 11% |
Datafolha | 10 Nov | – | 27% | 15% | 14% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 12% |
Datafolha | 6–7 Nov | – | 25% | 15% | 14% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 13%[c] | 9% | 10% |
Datafolha | 1–3 Nov | – | 21% | 14% | 13% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 17%[d] | 13% | 7% |
Datafolha | 25–26 Oct | 5,251 | 26% | 14% | 15% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 4% | 5%[e] | 13% | 11% |
Datafolha | 18–19 Oct | 5,261 | 26% | 14% | 15% | 8% | 9% | 7% | 3% | 5%[f] | 13% | 11% |
Datafolha | 7–8 Oct | 4,893 | 29% | 10% | 13% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 3% | 4%[f] | 17% | 16% |
Datafolha | 23–24 Sep | 5,057 | 33% | 7% | 15% | 6% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 5%[f] | 17% | 18% |
Datafolha | 2–3 Sep | 4,981 | 40% | 6% | 14% | 5% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 4%[f] | 16% | 26% |
Datafolha | 19–20 Aug | 5,079 | 41% | 5% | 14% | 5% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 4%[f] | 18% | 27% |
Datafolha | 22–23 Jul | 5,156 | 38% | 6% | 12% | 6% | 7% | 2% | 4% | 4%[f] | 21% | 26% |
Datafolha | 1–2 Jul | 10,212 | 40% | 7% | 12% | 6% | 5% | 2% | 5% | 5%[g] | 18% | 28% |
Datafolha | 3–4 Jun | 10,447 | 42% | 7% | 11% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 5% | 4%[g] | 21% | 31% |
Datafolha | 23–24 Apr | 10,421 | 14% | 12% | 13% | 6% | 5% | 1% | – | 24%[h] | 21% | 4% |
Second round
Active candidates |
Fernando Collor (PRN) |
Lula (PT) |
Abstentions/Undecided |
Pollster/client(s) | Date(s) conducted |
Sample size |
Collor PRN |
Lula PT |
Abst. Undec. |
Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1989 election | 17 Dec | – | 53.03% | 46.97% | 5.42% | 6.06% |
Datafolha | 17 Dec[b] | 11,995 | 51.5% | 48.5% | – | 3.0% |
Datafolha | 16 Dec | 11,995 | 47% | 44% | 10% | 3% |
Datafolha | 12–13 Dec | 5,250 | 46% | 45% | 9% | 1% |
Datafolha | 8 Dec | 5,250 | 47% | 44% | 9% | 3% |
Datafolha | 4 Dec | 5,250 | 49% | 41% | 10% | 9% |
Datafolha | 30 Nov | 5,250 | 50% | 40% | 10% | 10% |
Datafolha | 22 Nov | 5,716 | 48% | 39% | 13% | 9% |
Results
Fernando Collor received the most votes in most states, except for the Federal District, where Lula came first, and Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, won by Leonel Brizola. In the second round, Lula won in Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, the Federal District, and his home state of Pernambuco, whilst Collor carried every other state.[21]
By federative unit
First round
Federative unit | Collor | Lula | Brizola | Covas | Maluf | Afif | Ulysses | Other candidates | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | |
Acre | 49,862 | 38.95% | 22,954 | 17.93% | 8,582 | 6.70% | 3,716 | 2.90% | 12,882 | 10.06% | 7,149 | 5.58% | 14,580 | 11.39% | 8,285 | 6.47% |
Alagoas | 554,612 | 64.38% | 76,227 | 8.85% | 63,071 | 7.32% | 67,240 | 7.81% | 9,253 | 1.07% | 26,869 | 3.12% | 9,138 | 1.06% | 55,060 | 6.39% |
Amapá | 42,255 | 48.42% | 21,026 | 24.09% | 4,935 | 5.65% | 3,695 | 4.23% | 1,960 | 2.25% | 4,323 | 4.95% | 3,883 | 4.45% | 5,194 | 5.95% |
Amazonas | 300,848 | 50.49% | 125,406 | 21.05% | 26,129 | 4.39% | 36,380 | 6.11% | 24,832 | 4.17% | 36,544 | 6.13% | 17,303 | 2.90% | 28,427 | 4.77% |
Bahia | 1,408,614 | 34.77% | 1,050,444 | 25.93% | 229,186 | 5.66% | 248,803 | 6.14% | 72,200 | 1.78% | 100,970 | 2.49% | 638,007 | 15.75% | 302,851 | 7.48% |
Ceará | 861,030 | 33.09% | 321,526 | 12.36% | 505,440 | 19.43% | 477,286 | 18.34% | 108,877 | 4.18% | 60,228 | 2.31% | 85,406 | 3.28% | 182,063 | 7.00% |
Espírito Santo | 468,910 | 39.62% | 264,983 | 22.39% | 105,093 | 8.88% | 118,048 | 9.97% | 32,221 | 2.72% | 45,644 | 3.86% | 71,408 | 6.03% | 77,263 | 6.53% |
Federal District | 172,818 | 22.75% | 220,720 | 29.06% | 71,719 | 9.44% | 135,227 | 17.81% | 31,364 | 4.13% | 48,068 | 6.33% | 26,167 | 3.45% | 53,397 | 7.03% |
Goiás | 803,199 | 45.39% | 298,261 | 16.86% | 70,146 | 3.96% | 101,514 | 5.74% | 80,376 | 4.54% | 111,808 | 6.32% | 157,355 | 8.89% | 146,852 | 8.30% |
Maranhão | 609,758 | 46.93% | 255,586 | 19.67% | 116,539 | 8.97% | 44,154 | 3.40% | 35,939 | 2.77% | 54,021 | 4.16% | 72,794 | 5.60% | 110,471 | 8.50% |
Mato Grosso | 344,973 | 46.60% | 76,700 | 10.36% | 75,194 | 10.16% | 33,472 | 4.52% | 43,679 | 5.90% | 66,916 | 9.04% | 56,209 | 7.59% | 43,132 | 5.83% |
Mato Grosso do Sul | 436,539 | 53.23% | 73,697 | 8.99% | 63,721 | 7.77% | 50,465 | 6.15% | 47,237 | 5.76% | 60,061 | 7.32% | 44,130 | 5.38% | 44.313 | 5.40% |
Minas Gerais | 2,801,422 | 36.12% | 1,792,789 | 23.11% | 418,935 | 5.40% | 799,227 | 10.30% | 275,669 | 3.55% | 503,027 | 6.48% | 459,308 | 5.92% | 706,515 | 9.11% |
Pará | 793,384 | 52.01% | 294,981 | 19.34% | 52,361 | 3.43% | 101,282 | 6.64% | 62,848 | 4.12% | 65,419 | 4.29% | 66,384 | 4.35% | 88,667 | 5.81% |
Paraíba | 457,129 | 35.16% | 313,895 | 24.14% | 186,076 | 14.31% | 94,774 | 7.29% | 33,777 | 2.60% | 25,659 | 1.97% | 97,634 | 7.51% | 91,247 | 7.02% |
Paraná | 1,738,216 | 40.64% | 353,907 | 8.27% | 616,170 | 14.41% | 325,652 | 7.61% | 319,932 | 7.48% | 494,608 | 11.56% | 144,687 | 3.38% | 284,052 | 6.64% |
Pernambuco | 1,066,986 | 37.74% | 950,189 | 33.61% | 265,548 | 9.39% | 101,093 | 3.58% | 43,518 | 1.54% | 70,093 | 2.48% | 89,991 | 3.18% | 239,410 | 8.47% |
Piauí | 383,632 | 39.75% | 219,406 | 22.73% | 93,507 | 9.69% | 48,763 | 5.05% | 38,236 | 3.96% | 36,829 | 3.82% | 61,037 | 6.32% | 83,662 | 8.67% |
Rio de Janeiro | 1,189,385 | 16.07% | 904,223 | 12.22% | 3,855,561 | 52.09% | 643,786 | 8.70% | 115,656 | 1.56% | 191,751 | 2.59% | 124,752 | 1.69% | 376,389 | 5.09% |
Rio Grande do Norte | 326,878 | 33.37% | 239,010 | 24.40% | 78,259 | 7.99% | 56,768 | 5.80% | 52,546 | 5.36% | 20,846 | 2.13% | 139,093 | 14.20% | 66,084 | 6.75% |
Rio Grande do Sul | 480,842 | 9.23% | 350,062 | 6.72% | 3,262,925 | 62.66% | 249,384 | 4.79% | 309,406 | 5.94% | 178,311 | 3.42% | 185,433 | 3.56% | 190,826 | 3.66% |
Rondônia | 165,607 | 42.82% | 75,532 | 19.53% | 39,650 | 10.25% | 13,718 | 3.55% | 24,934 | 6.45% | 26,123 | 6.75% | 19,370 | 5.01% | 21,800 | 5.64% |
Roraima | 32,130 | 59.72% | 5,417 | 10.07% | 5,092 | 9.47% | 2,944 | 5.47% | 1,377 | 2.56% | 2,252 | 4.19% | 1,589 | 2.95% | 2,996 | 5.57% |
Santa Catarina | 566,990 | 23.52% | 255,015 | 10.58% | 632,170 | 26.22% | 177,980 | 7.38% | 236,151 | 9.79% | 206,957 | 8.58% | 242,757 | 10.07% | 93,042 | 3.86% |
São Paulo | 4,085,223 | 24.40% | 2,921,970 | 17.45% | 252,651 | 1.51% | 3,802,330 | 22.71% | 3,934,334 | 23.50% | 807,944 | 4.83% | 331,576 | 1.98% | 605,316 | 3.62% |
Sergipe | 301,730 | 50.81% | 108,002 | 18.19% | 55,751 | 9.39% | 39,499 | 6.65% | 23,550 | 3.97% | 9,744 | 1.64% | 12,161 | 2.05% | 43,442 | 7.31% |
Tocantins | 164,964 | 57.08% | 27,888 | 9.65% | 11,605 | 4.02% | 9,739 | 3.37% | 13,258 | 4.59% | 9,822 | 3.40% | 32,701 | 11.32% | 19,023 | 6.58% |
Abroad | 3,094 | 24.66% | 2,505 | 19.96% | 1,649 | 13.14% | 3,442 | 27.43% | 573 | 4.57% | 534 | 4.26% | 143 | 1.14% | 609 | 4.85% |
Source: Superior Electoral Court |
Second round
Federative unit | Collor | Lula | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | |||||||||||||
Acre | 89,103 | 69.18% | 39,695 | 30.82% | ||||||||||||
Alagoas | 683,920 | 76.07% | 215,177 | 23.93% | ||||||||||||
Amapá | 53,780 | 64.25% | 29,926 | 35.75% | ||||||||||||
Amazonas | 397,103 | 66.79% | 197,431 | 33.21% | ||||||||||||
Bahia | 2,118,307 | 51.68% | 1,980,907 | 48.32% | ||||||||||||
Ceará | 1,478,288 | 56.91% | 1,119,367 | 43.09% | ||||||||||||
Espírito Santo | 689,981 | 59.30% | 473,597 | 40.70% | ||||||||||||
Federal District | 268,963 | 37.32% | 451,780 | 62.68% | ||||||||||||
Goiás | 1,160,446 | 68.44% | 535,142 | 31.56% | ||||||||||||
Maranhão | 867,188 | 62.44% | 521,753 | 37.56% | ||||||||||||
Mato Grosso | 475,046 | 66.39% | 240,486 | 33.61% | ||||||||||||
Mato Grosso do Sul | 579,064 | 72.85% | 215,859 | 27.15% | ||||||||||||
Minas Gerais | 4,186,658 | 55.51% | 3,355,125 | 44.49% | ||||||||||||
Pará | 1,105,646 | 72.49% | 419,643 | 27.51% | ||||||||||||
Paraíba | 740,208 | 54.97% | 606,446 | 45.03% | ||||||||||||
Paraná | 2,793,218 | 67.29% | 1,357,754 | 32.71% | ||||||||||||
Pernambuco | 1,455,747 | 49.10% | 1,509,102 | 50.90% | ||||||||||||
Piauí | 590,594 | 58.92% | 411,814 | 41.08% | ||||||||||||
Rio de Janeiro | 1,941,499 | 27.08% | 5,227,886 | 72.92% | ||||||||||||
Rio Grande do Norte | 535,195 | 52.59% | 482,463 | 47.41% | ||||||||||||
Rio Grande do Sul | 1,532,824 | 31.28% | 3,366,795 | 68.72% | ||||||||||||
Rondônia | 234,272 | 63.25% | 136,123 | 36.75% | ||||||||||||
Roraima | 39,916 | 76.35% | 12,364 | 23.65% | ||||||||||||
Santa Catarina | 1,167,689 | 50.32% | 1,152,730 | 49.68% | ||||||||||||
São Paulo | 9,270,501 | 57.90% | 6,739,403 | 42.10% | ||||||||||||
Sergipe | 403,480 | 65.89% | 208,829 | 34.11% | ||||||||||||
Tocantins | 227,029 | 78.39% | 62,576 | 21.61% | ||||||||||||
Abroad | 4,541 | 44.65% | 5,630 | 55.35% | ||||||||||||
Source: Superior Electoral Court |
Notes
- ^ a b Same party as the presidential candidate, unless mentioned in parentheses
- ^ a b Exit poll conducted on election day.
- ^ Sílvio Santos (PMB) with 10%
- ^ Sílvio Santos (PMB) with 14%
- ^ Aureliano Chaves (PFL) with 1%
- ^ a b c d e f Aureliano Chaves (PFL) with 1%
- ^ a b Aureliano Chaves (PFL) with 2%
- ^ Orestes Quércia (PMDB) with 18%; Jânio Quadros with 4%
- ^ On 9 November 1989, the Superior Electoral Court revoked the provisional registry of the Brazilian Municipalist Party, for not having held the minimum number of regional conventions required by law. Armando Corrêa was therefore disqualified for the election, and all votes cast for the candidate were annulled.[22]
References
- ^ "Bipartidarismo: Sistema vigorou durante a ditadura militar". educacao.uol.com.br (in Brazilian Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2021-01-08. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Globo, Acervo-Jornal O. "Sequestro do empresário Abilio Diniz agitou campanha presidencial em 1989". Acervo (in Brazilian Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ "A guerra ao turbante". Abril. Veja.com. 23 March 1988. Archived from the original on 17 March 2009. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
No seu papel de caçador de marajás, o alagoano Fernando Collor de Mello torna-se um dos governadores mais populares do país
- ^ Brooke, James (1992-11-08). "Looting Brazil (Published 1992)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2021-01-28. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Coimbra, Marcos (17 May 2013). "Marcos Coimbra: A "síndrome de Collor", engano recorrente". Viomundo. Archived from the original on 12 May 2015. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
- ^ a b Haroldo Ceravolo, Sereza (2009-11-15). "Relação com a Globo 'ajudou bastante', lembra Collor; senador diz ter pensado, na véspera, que perderia a eleição". Noticias.uol.com.br. UOL. Archived from the original on 2021-01-21.
- ^ "Roadmap to Brazil's presidency: win in Minas Gerais". The Brazilian Report. 2018-08-20. Archived from the original on 2020-07-01. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ "Fernando Collor De Mello | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Ramalho, José Ricardo; Rodrigues, Iram Jácome (August 2018). "Sindicalismo do ABC e a Era Lula: Contradições e Resistências". Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política (104): 67–96. doi:10.1590/0102-067096/104. ISSN 0102-6445. Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Elizangela (2018-01-21). "Brizola 1989: eleições livres ou golpe?". PDT (in Brazilian Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Richard Bourne (19 October 2009). Lula of Brazil: The Story So Far. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520261556.
- ^ "Eleições 2006 – Com votação recorde, Lula chega ao segundo mandato". G1. Grupo Globo. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 3 October 2010.
- ^ Jacky Picard, ed. Le Brésil de Lula: Les défis d'un socialisme démocratique à la périphérie du capitalisme. Paris: Khartala, 2003, page 81
- ^ Brooke, James (1989-12-13). "Polls Show Brazilian Leftist Candidate Closing Gap as Election Day Nears (Published 1989)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2021-07-30. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ a b Cavgias, Alexsandros; Corbi, Raphael; Meloni, Luis; Novaes, Lucas M. (2023). "Media Manipulation in Young Democracies: Evidence From the 1989 Brazilian Presidential Election". Comparative Political Studies. doi:10.1177/00104140231169027. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 258937696. Archived from the original on 2023-05-28. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
- ^ "Brazil President Resigns in Wake of Impeachment". Los Angeles Times. 1992-12-30. Archived from the original on 2022-10-24. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ "A eleição de 2018 será como a de 1989? Sim e não, segundo o UBS | EXAME". Archived from the original on 2018-10-28. Retrieved 2018-10-28.
- ^ "Há 25 anos, Silvio Santos tentou presidência; você votaria?". Terra. Archived from the original on 30 August 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
- ^ Wendy Hunter, The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. Cambridge University Press, 2010, ISBN 978-0-521-51455-2, page 111
- ^ Globo, Acervo-Jornal O. "Sequestro do empresário Abilio Diniz agitou campanha presidencial em 1989". Acervo (in Brazilian Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Brazil. Presidential Election 1989 Archived 2014-07-07 at the Wayback Machine Electoral Geography
- ^ Reis, Alessandra V. "Partido Municipalista Brasileiro (PMB)". FGV CPDOC (in Portuguese). Retrieved 28 November 2023.