Le Monument vivant de Biron

Le Monument vivant de Biron
The monument is located on Place Jean-Poussou, in Biron, near the wooden market hall.
Le Monument vivant de Biron is located in Dordogne
Le Monument vivant de Biron
Le Monument vivant de Biron
ArtistJochen Gerz
Year1996
MediumWork in progress
MovementContemporary Art
SubjectWar memorial
Dimensions360 cm × 316 cm × 316 cm (140 in × 124 in × 124 in)
Location France
Biron
Coordinates44°37′53″N 0°52′18″E / 44.63139°N 0.87167°E / 44.63139; 0.87167

The Monument vivant de Biron is a work by German artist Jochen Gerz, inaugurated in 1996. On the former war memorial in front of a wooden hall in the French commune of Biron, in the Dordogne department, the artist randomly and anonymously placed plaques engraved with the answers of local residents to the question: "What do you think would be important enough to risk your life for?" Originally consisting of 127 plaques, this "living anti-monument" is a typical example of the work-in-progress technique, enriching itself over time with the confessions of new residents.

The monument is seen as both an art object and the result of a local social and democratic process. Critically acclaimed, Le Monument vivant de Biron is a benchmark among atypical war memorials and contemporary works of art. Since the 2000s, it has been studied in France at elementary and secondary school level.

Context

The Dordogne is one of the richest départements in terms of heritage.[1] Tourists visiting the Périgord are particularly interested in its historic monuments and numerous castles, including Château de Biron.[1][2] As tourism is above all an important economic factor for local communities (over a third of their annual income), all development projects in rural and agricultural areas are strongly encouraged.[1] Numerous pro-active policies were part of the "heritage vogue" in France in the 1990s.[3][4] A vast heritage investment project was launched in the south of the department by the elected representatives of the Beaumont canton, in conjunction with the architect of the Bâtiments de France,[5] the Direction régionale des affaires culturelles (DRAC) and the Ministry of Culture, to develop new works that would involve "all sectors of local life".[3]

In 1992, when Biron mayor Marc Mattera began road renovation work, he asked the French Ministry of Culture to launch a national public order to replace the town's war memorial, which had fallen into disrepair and oblivion.[5][6] Located at the entrance to the village on the Place Jean-Poussou,[N 1] the white cement obelisk had been erected in 1921-1922 in memory of the dead of the Great War, then World War II.[2][5][6] German artist Jochen Gerz was chosen to restore the monument, even though the commune's inspector of historical monuments was initially opposed to the artist's selection.[6][7] He is known as the precursor of "anti-monumental" practices, which aim to redesign monuments whose sole function is to remember tragic events.[2][4][6][8] The Monument vivant de Biron followed two other similar and singular works by the artist: Le contre-monument au fascisme de Hambourg (1986) and Le contre-monument au racisme de Sarrebruck (1993), which were already famous for overturning the concept of the war memorial and the symbolism of remembrance.[2][6][9][10]

Description and design

The monument[N 2] was rebuilt identically in yellow Dordogne and Burgundy stone,[2][11][12] then raised on a plinth, the whole placed on a three-degree sloping base.[12] Jochen Gerz began by refixing the two old plaques on the monument: "Aux morts de la Grande Guerre, perpétuel souvenir" (To those deceased during the Great War, perpetual remembrance) (nine names) and "Déportés 1944" (Deported 1944) (two names).[6]

With the idea of passing on the memory of the past from generation to generation,[2] the artist collaborated with students from the Bordeaux School of Fine Arts.[2][11][12] In March 1996, Jochen Gerz conducted two weeks of individual interviews with the village's 127 oldest inhabitants.[2][12][13] At first, the inhabitants were impressed by the artist's image and, what's more, his German nationality, which seemed to be at odds with the task of renovating the monument.[9] However, he systematically began by introducing himself and explaining the reasons for his presence, in order to establish a climate of trust.[9] In each interview, he slipped in a question: "What do you think would be important enough to risk your life for?"[2][13] With the support of the students, he recorded their answers by hand. Isolated in the rhythm of the exchanges, it is these confessions, each around seven lines long,[12] which were then engraved on red enamelled iron plaques[N 3] and placed randomly and anonymously on the monument and even on the ground.[2][12] It is the plurality, eclecticism and spontaneity of the responses that make up the work.[2][14]

Jochen Gerz encourages the continuation of this interactive and democratic process, which gives a voice to local residents: spectators are also co-authors of the work[2][12][15] which thus takes the form of a work in progress.[13] The artist has entrusted a couple living in the village with the responsibility of asking the question ad libitum, to new residents and to those who will come of age in the commune in the years to come.[2][12] If the space on the monument runs out, additional blank plaques by the artist are kept by the couple.[2] According to the artist, "the ideal would be for this work never to be finished and for no one to be able to see it in its entirety. And that others after the first two people to succeed me would continue to ask the question. It will be a work of mine that I will never know and that will never stop changing".[12][16]

The Monument vivant de Biron was inaugurated on July 13, 1996, the day of the village festival.[5] The monument remains the property of the commune of Biron.[11]

It's the people from Biron that make up the monument.

— Jochen Gerz, in July, 1996.[17]

Interpretation

The work differs from conventional war memorials, which simply consist of a ritual formula generally appended to a vertical list of the names of the deceased.[2] The stele alone is not the monument, but the set of plaques that spill out onto the ground.[4] Unlike Mario Merz's La suite de Fibonacci (Strasbourg, 1994)[N 4] and Jan Dibbets's Hommage à Arago (Paris, 1994), Le Monument vivant de Biron "aims for horizontality" through the arrangement of its plaques, and "offers itself on a human scale", according to Sébastien Thiery.[4] The work thus breaks with "commemorative, monumental and perennial art, the home of artistic conformism".[4][10] The artist's work is not aimed exclusively at an informed public, but also and above all feeds on social ties and dialogue with citizens.[14]

To keep his message alive and open to interpretation, the work was conceived as both an art object and a social process of territorial and national unity.[2][13][18] According to the artist himself, the monument "awaits a time that is not yet here", in addition to its function as an object of remembrance.[10][19] It seeks to create a community in the present, to involve the public in the long term and to open up to the future.[2][18][19] The aim is to share this place and lift the taboo of "loneliness", "absence", "emptiness" and "disappearance" resulting from the horrors of war and the Holocaust.[12][19][20] The de-theatricalization and eviction of violence is one of the main features of Le Monument vivant de Biron.[15] Sébastien Thiery also raised the question of the work's conviviality, presented as "a seductive communication operation aimed at citizen voters". He also saw it as a symbolic way of overexposing conflicts and masking nameless violence to legitimize the political and security order.[21]

Jochen Gerz managed to turn this war memorial into a "living" work,[7] hence the name of the work chosen by the artist.[6][12][22] Audrey Rousseau adds that the meaning of this "living memory appropriate to the living" lies in the public's ability to understand and individually arrange the hidden meaning of symbolic elements; this is "an original way of linking the legacy of the two world wars based on the testimony of the living".[2] In posing his question, Jochen Gerz is attentive to the commemorative needs of the people who will come into contact with the work. He discreetly invites them to express their pain, to reflect on what is important in their lives, and to take a stand on the value of their own lives.[2][6] The choice of first-person narrative ("I" and "we") invites the public reading the plaques to feel the emotion of these stories.[2] The local, national and specialized press agree that Le Monument vivant de Biron offers a moving and human experience of proximity.[15][23][24]

By transgressing the boundaries of art as they are classically conceived, the work is considered by Sébastien Thiery to be an "ideal-typical of contemporary public monuments".[15]

Pedagogical use

In France, Le Monument vivant de Biron is the subject of study and analysis in art and art history classes at elementary and middle school levels. It is presented as a representative example of contemporary public art,[25] war memorials,[26][27] the interaction of art with the public,[28] work in progress,[29] commemorative sculpture, the "symbolic body" and "dynamic, embodied memory".[30][31]

Notes

  1. ^ The monument is precisely located between the wooden market hall, the line of the old ramparts and the path leading to Château de Biron.
  2. ^ The dimensions of the monument are as follows: 360cm*316cm*316cm
  3. ^ The dimensions of each plate are as follows: 10*17,5*1 cm
  4. ^ La suite de Fibonacci by Mario Merz is made up of light boxes placed on the ground along a tramway line

References

  1. ^ a b c Bergues & Amiel 2016, p. 103.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Rousseau 2017.
  3. ^ a b Bergues & Amiel 2016, p. 104.
  4. ^ a b c d e Thiery 2003, p. 118.
  5. ^ a b c d Thiery 2003, p. 115.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Breerette 1996.
  7. ^ a b Lorcin & Brewer 2009.
  8. ^ Lagnier 1999, p. 5.
  9. ^ a b c Mesnard 1997, pp. 72–75.
  10. ^ a b c Guigues 2015, pp. 16–18.
  11. ^ a b c Centre national des arts plastiques 2020.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Lagnier 1999, p. 6.
  13. ^ a b c d Thiery 2003, p. 116.
  14. ^ a b Thiery 2003, pp. 120–121.
  15. ^ a b c d Thiery 2003, p. 117.
  16. ^ Gerz 1996, p. 167.
  17. ^ Thiery 2003, p. 119.
  18. ^ a b Tratnjek 2009.
  19. ^ a b c Mesnard 2015, p. 40.
  20. ^ Gerz 1996, p. 10.
  21. ^ Thiery 2003, pp. 122–123.
  22. ^ Gerz 1996, p. 160.
  23. ^ Galy 1996, p. 6.
  24. ^ Robert 1996, p. 22.
  25. ^ Ruby 2007, p. 11.
  26. ^ Cuin & Lavigne 2018, p. 37.
  27. ^ Guinchard 2018.
  28. ^ Benoît & Philippot 2017, p. 56.
  29. ^ Collège Jean-Rostand 2012.
  30. ^ Sabourdin & Bouvier 2005.
  31. ^ Académie de Nantes 2006.

Bibliography