Template:Undue weight inline
[undue weight? – discuss]
Usage
{undue inline|{subst:DATE}{undue inline|reason=your justification|{subst:DATE}{undue inline|1=Talk section|reason=your justification|{subst:DATE}
Add this template after a fact or posit to signify that this statement may be giving undue weight to an idea or point of view. The template may also be used to identify a fringe idea. To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {undue-inline|talk page section name}.
Parameters
- 1 – section name of the Talk page discussion to link to (optional; no default)
- reason – your justification for placing the template (optional; no default)
Redirects
- {Weight}
See also
Wikipedia project pages
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Consensus
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Template index
- Wikipedia:Template namespace
Templates
Disputed factual accuracy
- Boxes:
- {Disputed} For disputing entire article
- {Dispute about|what} For disputing part of an article
- {Disputed section} For disputing a section in an article
- {Disputed tag} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {Under discussion} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {Dubious}, and {Disputed inline} Statement
- {Under discussion inline} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV
- Boxes:
- {Controversial} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)
- Boxes:
- {POV} Article, {POV section} Section, {POV lead} Lead section
- {POV map} Map
- Inline:
- {Unbalanced opinion} Statement
- {POV statement} Statement
Wiki
This template adds an inline cleanup tag, questioning if a source has been given undue weight.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month and year | 1 date | The month and year of when the tag was added.
| String | suggested |
| Reason | reason | An optional explanation for why the tag has been added. | String | suggested |