Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria.

Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and at peer review at the same time. Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. Please do not split featured list candidate pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings).

The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegate, PresN, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will last at least ten days (though most last a month or longer) and may be lengthened where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:

  • actionable objections have not been resolved; or
  • consensus for promotion has not been reached; or
  • insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met.

It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.

After a reasonable time has passed, the director or delegates will decide when a nomination is ready to be closed. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the {FLC} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {Article history} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of contents – Closing instructions – Checklinks – Dablinks – Check redirects

Shortcut

Featured content:

Featured list tools:

Nomination procedure

  1. Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived.
  2. Place {subst:FLC} on the talk page of the nominated list.
  3. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance.
  4. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page.
  5. Finally, place {Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary.

Supporting and objecting

Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

  • To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page).
  • To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this.
  • To oppose a nomination, write * '''Object''' or * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. References on style and grammar do not always agree; if a contributor cites support for a certain style in a standard reference work or other authoritative source, reviewers should consider accepting it. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. Alternatively, reviewers may hide lengthy, resolved commentary in a cap template with a signature in the header. This method should be used only when necessary, because it can cause the FLC archives to exceed template limits.
  • If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so after the reviewer's signature, rather than striking out or splitting up the reviewer's text. Per talk page guidelines, nominators should not cap, alter, strike, break up or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page, with a diff to the reviewer's talk page showing the request to reconsider.
  • Graphics (such as {done} and {not done}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time.
  • To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.
Nominations urgently needing reviews

The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so:

Source reviews needed

The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

List of Dallas Cowboys first-round draft picks

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

This is my 6th in the NFL team's first-round picks series and, if all goes well, it'll be the 26th list in the series promoted. I will, as always, do my best to respond quickly and address all comments, questions, and criticisms. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

List of FIFA Women's World Cup finals

Nominator(s): SounderBruce 06:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

The Women's World Cup wrapped up a few months ago, but I've had my eye on improving this list for a while and decided to dedicate an evening to doing just that tonight after watching the W Gold Cup. The list's existing elements were all preserved while a substantial amount of prose with good citations was added; most of it was modeled after the list of men's finals, a relatively ancient FL, with some modern tweaks. (This is my second concurrent nomination, but my first has three supports.) SounderBruce 06:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

MPGuy2824's comments
  • "continental competitions alongside the hosts, who have an automatic berth" to "continental competitions, alongside the hosts who have an automatic berth"
  • "the two remaining teams beyond the semifinal round" can be simplified to "the two winning/successful teams of the semifinal round, "
  • " The hosted by Australia and New Zealand in 2023" - a word got eaten somewhere.
  • See if you want make the country name into a header cell in each row. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey man im josh

Source review: Pending

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
    • Ref 14, 17, and 20 – Needs url-access parameter specified, as when I visit the links I'm being told I need a subscription to view them.
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
  • Spot checks on 8 sources match what they are being cited for

Other comments:

  • This could do with a run of iabot
  • Missing row scopes in the results by nation table.
  • They key calls out "Match was decided during extra time", but this isn't used anywhere in the list.
  • Caption for the 2023 final image could use a period at the end.

That's all I've got, good stuff as always SounderBruce! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Indianapolis 500 pole-sitters

Nominator(s): EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

I've reworked this list for the past ten months so that it is fully referenced, verifiable and more accessible. Feedback will be taken into account and acted on as fast as possible. EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Municipalities of Puebla

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Yet another list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 43 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 15:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Oops don't know how I missed that, but it's fixed now. Mattximus (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824's comments
  • "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal) by a plurality voting system who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." to "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal), by a plurality voting system, who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) which is responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." Done
  • "user fees" might need a wikilink (or an explanation). Done - the wikilink is actually quite good.
  • a couple of refs seem to follow the y-m-d format for dates, while most of the article seems to follow mdy. This should be consistent throughout the article. Done MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
  • All changes made, thanks for the review! Mattximus (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

List of accolades received by TV Patrol

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because its format is almost identical to another one (which is a newscast) with the same class, List of accolades received by 24 Oras. Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "the newscast's anchors changed significantly during its run" - if it is still being broadcast I would say "the newscast's anchors have changed significantly during its run"
  • "Each segment has a unique topic, such as entertainment and weather" => "Each segment has a unique topic, such as entertainment or weather" (current wording could be interpreted as saying that there is a single segment which deals with entertainment and weather, which would be intriguing but I assume doesn't happen :-)
  • That's all I got! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
ChrisTheDude, done. Chompy Ace 23:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

List of UEFA Europa Conference League finals

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

This is the newest UEFA competition and has been a welcome addition to the European football calendar. I'm going to address the big sticking point immediately which is that there are only two entries, soon to be three in a couple of months. The competition is new and guaranteed to run for more years to come, so although it's a small list at the moment, it will swell over the years. While I recognise this may be an issue, I do think this fact should be enough to ensure it doesn't fall foul of the guidelines NapHit (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Only one accessiblity issue with the table- you can't use table-spanning cells as a "pseudo header" like you are for "Upcoming finals". Not just for screen-reader software (which won't treat it like a header at all), but even for regular browsers- the sorting doesn't work at all. Easiest fix is to just make that section have 2 tables - "List of UEFA Europa Conference League finals" (which could just be "UEFA Europa Conference League finals") and "Upcoming finals.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 15:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks @PresN:, I've just removed the upcoming finals bit, as that does feel like it's WP:CRYSTAL territory. NapHit (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Ireland women's cricket team record by opponent

Nominator(s): RoboCric Let's chat 13:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets all the criteria. I think it has enough content and an organized list to get the featured status. Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 13:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

  • There's a fairly evident copy & paste error where it says "Year of the first match between New Zealand and the listed opponent" ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude I am sorry for the error and I have corrected it. Please check it now. RoboCric Let's chat 01:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Further comments

  • "They are full member" => "The team is a full member"
  • "They participated in Women's Cricket World Cup" => "They participated in the Women's Cricket World Cup"
  • "resulting 49 victories" => "resulting in 49 victories"
  • "They have played the most number of matches (25)" => "They have played the highest number of matches (25)"
  • "against the Netherlands in Women's Cricket World Cup" => "against the Netherlands in the Women's Cricket World Cup"
  • "Although in April 2021, the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams"> "Although the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams in April 2021"
  • "when they played against the West Indies in a one-off WT20I at home" - you need to write W20TI in full the first time it's used, the same way you did with WODI
  • "Ireland have met with Pakistan for the most number of occasions"> "Ireland have met with Pakistan on the highest number of occasions"
  • "they have defeated Zimbabwe for the most number of times (6)"> "they have defeated Zimbabwe most often (6)" (this avoids using "highest number" again.....
  • "against whom Ireland have suffered the most number of defeats" => "against whom Ireland have suffered the most defeats"
  • " losing all of their 17 matches they played" => " losing all of the 17 matches they played"
  • How come there's nothing in the "first" and "last" columns of the WODI table for Netherlands and New Zealand?
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude Done. Fixed all. Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 10:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1989

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

And so we bring the history of Billboard's R&B/soul/black singles chart in the 1980s to a close, with a host of songs written by a guy who apparently had the face of a baby and a rare example of a song which topped this chart but failed to enter the Hot 100 at all. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and acted upon as speedily as humanly possible -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh
  • Source review: Passed
    • Reliable enough for the information being cited
    • Consistent date formatting
    • Consistent and proper reference formatting
    • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
    • Spot checks on 11 sources match what they are being cited for
  • The second and third links in the see also section are redirects, I suggest bypassing them.
  • Everything looks to sort properly from my playing around

Support, great work as always Chris. On another note, is there a task force that can turn Ain't Nuthin' in the World into an article? It's clearly notable, but someone turned it into a redirect back in November, 2020. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

  • The following week it was displaced by "Superwoman" -- comma after week
  • the trio would only have one further chart-topper -- might be worth indicating what year (if not 1993)
  • In June the hip hop trio -- comma after June
  • which was taken from the soundtrack of the film "Do the Right Thing" -- If film title, I believe this should be in italics and without quotations
  • That's all from me. Another great series. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

SZA discography

Nominator(s): ‍  Elias 🪐  (dreaming of Saturn; talk here) 07:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

SZA. You might know her from "Kill Bill" or "Snooze", or the fact that she has a whimsical name that rhymes with sizzle and scissor, or the dozens of passe jokes about how she lies all the time. She has been in the game for over a decade, changing the contemporary R&B (and now pop) scene as she goes with her highly acclaimed works. Her first two albums are in Rolling Stone's GOAT list, and the first one (2017) has never left the US charts. Dive into her relatively short discography here. ‍  Elias 🪐  (dreaming of Saturn; talk here) 07:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Zimbabwe

Nominator(s): Tone 10:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Zimbabwe has five sites on the list and two tentative sites, so this list is on the shorter side. Standard style. The list for South Africa is already seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 10:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

MPguy2824's comments
  • "One site is transnational, the Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls is shared with Zambia." seems a bit odd. you can either replace the comma with a semi-colon OR go with "Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls is the only transnational site (it is shared with Zambia).
  • Consider linking "dry season".
  • " In dry season, the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities, including African elephant, hippopotamus, African buffalo, waterbuck, zebra, together with the predators such as lion, leopard, cheetah, as well as Nile crocodile." to " In the dry season, the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities, including the African elephant, hippopotamus, African buffalo, waterbuck, zebra, together with predators such as the lion, leopard, cheetah, as well as the Nile crocodile."
  • "Eastern black rhinoceros lived here at the time of inscription but the remaining animals have since been moved for safekeeping elsewhere." to "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to live here at the time of inscription, but the remaining animals have since been moved for safekeeping elsewhere."
  • Will do a full prose review later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks! Will wait for a full review before fixing, easier this way :) Tone 15:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  • with trade links to China, Persia, and Kilwa Kisiwani. Kilwa Kisiwani doesn't seem to as important as the other two large areas. If it is important to keep, then add ", in present-day Tanzania" to the end of that sentence.
  • "abandoned around 1450" to "abandoned around the year 1450"
  • "Like the latter, it was built in dry stone technique in a similar architectural style" to "Like the latter, it was built using the dry stone technique and in a similar architectural style".
  • "and was an important regional centre of trade, with porcelain form China and Spain found among archaeological remains" - split this part into a new sentence and correct "form" to "from".
  • "Along the border between Zimbabwe and Zambia, the Zambezi river creates massive waterfalls, with the width of 1,708 m (5,604 ft) and the maximum height of 108 m (354 ft)." to "Along the border between Zimbabwe and Zambia, the Zambezi river creates a massive waterfall, with a width of 1,708 m (5,604 ft) and a maximum height of 108 m (354 ft).".
  • "Falling water creates" to "The falling water creates".
  • "created in millions of years of erosion" to "created over millions of years of erosion".
  • Wikilink "Kopje".
  • "in different manners" to "in different ways".
  • "the life of foraging people" to "the life of the foraging people". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
    Fixed all, thanks! I changed the link of Kilwa Kisiwani to the Kilwa Sultanate, since this was a power that ruled most of the east African coast at the time and is thus important. Tone 17:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
    • "the predators" - remove "the".
    • "Kilwai Sultanate." to "Kilwa Sultanate, on the east coast of Africa."
    • "cut into a basalt rock" - Remove the "a"
    • See MOS:CIRCA and use in all the places where it applies (I noticed 2). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
      Done, thanks. I haven't been using the MOS:CIRCA style earlier but it is convenient for future reference :) Tone 15:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support on prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "Mana Pools are" => "The Mana Pools are"
  • "the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities" => "the floodplains are an important refuge for large mammal communities"
  • "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to lived here" => "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to live here"
  • "Matobo Hills feature" => "The Matobo Hills feature"
  • "representing one of the densest concentration" => "representing one of the densest concentrations"
  • That's it! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
    Fixed, thanks! Not sure what are you suggesting with the rhinoceroses? Tone 21:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
    Take the d off the end of "lived" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
    Ah, silly me :D Fixing now. Tone 21:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

List of James McAvoy performances

Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it meets the criteria for FL everything I spent a bi of time painstakingly sourcing everything on the page. I reached out to another editor (@Lady Lotus:) to co-nominate this with me and they agreed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

DBC

  • I'll do a full review later, but as a drive-by comment I can see both "shared role with" and "shared roles with". Pretty sure it should be the former every time -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done

More comments

  • "The following year, he starred in Kevin Macdonald's drama film" => "The following year, he starred in director Kevin Macdonald's drama film" Done
  • "the collective title of three films split into three parts" - so the three films were each split into three parts? For a total of nine films? I don't think that's what you mean...... Done
  • If you sort on any other column and then re-sort the "year" column back to chronological order, "TBA" jumps to the top, which isn't right. Until such time as it has a confirmed date, you'll need to use a sorting template to make it sort last.
  • "The Sandman" sorts incorrectly in the TV table
  • Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

In addition to Chris's comments above

  • I would drop The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, and link it to 1950s novel instead so it won't appear repetitive. Done
  • In most cases I'm guilty of this too, but avoid WP:OFTHESAMENAME as much as possible -- McAvoy was cast as Charles Xavier, based on the Marvel Comics fictional character would be better Done
  • I would also refer to X-Men First Class as where he was cast in the role first. i.e. -- McAvoy was cast as Charles Xavier, based on ..., in the superhero film X-Men First Class, or somewhere along those lines. Done
  • In the next sentence, you could then state that he reprised the role or he returned to play the role in the film series installments and list them... Done
  • Stephen King's 1986 novel of the same name. -- Stephen King's 1986 novel or the 1986 novel by Stephen King are possible ways to write it. Done
  • I was wondering why there is only one line in the last paragraph discussing his stage credits. Perhaps this can be expanded and lumped into the lead, as he appears to have at least four Laurence Olivier nominations among the many roles he played, which suggests that it may be notable and perhaps worth including.
  • That's all from me. Great job on this. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 15:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

1970 NBA expansion draft

Nominator(s): -- ZooBlazer 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm continuing my journey of improving articles related to the Portland Trail Blazers. This was the fifth expansion draft in the NBA, featuring the newly founded Buffalo Braves, Cleveland Cavaliers, and Portland Trail Blazers selecting players for their inaugural seasons. I'm hoping to make this just the second NBA expansion draft article to become a featured list, with the other being 1966. -- ZooBlazer 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

  • I would link NBA in the infobox
    Oops, rookie mistake by me. Done. -- ZooBlazer
  • but folded the following month -- perhaps an alternative word choice for folded as it is a bit informal.
    It was surprisingly harder to find an alternative even after a Google search. I think I managed to figure something out though. -- ZooBlazer
  • After each round, where each of the expansion teams had selected one player each -- I think the second or last instance of each can be dropped, as it sounds a bit repetitive and would still convey the same. I'm leaning towards the second instance.
    I ended up just dropping both of the last two instances. -- ZooBlazer
  • briefly before he was waived -- Perhaps link waived
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • Worth linking trade on the first instance
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • That's all from me. Great work. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
    @Pseud 14: Thanks for the comments! I think I've addressed them all. -- ZooBlazer 17:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Changes look good. Support. Also, if interested, would appreciate a prose review on an older FLC here. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824's comments
  • Add a "(pictured in 2007)" for the Pat Riley image caption, since it is 37 years after the draft in question. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
    @MPGuy2824 Added -- ZooBlazer 18:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
    Support for prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "Buffalo, New York, Cleveland, Ohio, and Portland, Oregon were awarded the expansion teams" - is there a way to word this so that it doesn't sound like six different places were awarded teams? Maybe remove the states and just link the cities?
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • "Houston, Texas was also [...] had to end their pursuit" - Houston changes from being singular to plural mid-sentence
    Cleaned the sentence up by removing the pursuit part altogether. -- ZooBlazer
  • "the existing teams added another player to their protected list" => "each of the existing teams added another player to their protected list"
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • "However, Howell was immediately traded to the Philadelphia 76ers in exchange" => "Howell was immediately traded to the Philadelphia 76ers, however, in exchange"
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • "However, Ohl retired from playing prior to the start of the season and" => "Ohl retired from playing prior to the start of the season, however, and"
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • "However, Hetzel was waived without playing a game for the Blazers and" => "Hetzel was waived without playing a game for the Blazers, however, and"
    Done -- ZooBlazer
  • The order of the table seems to be alphabetical by team and then player. Would it be useful to list them by order of draft pick if this info is available?
    I've been unable to find any sources with the actual order, so I'm not sure if it's just not public knowledge or if it is because it happened so long ago. The closest thing I found was only the first six picks. -- ZooBlazer
  • "No reliable single source listing the drafts, so all of them are cited separately" - this reads a bit "meta" to me. I don't personally think discussion of reliable sourcing or lack thereof belongs in an article. Maybe circumvent this by changing that note to "The previous expansion drafts took place in [year], [year], etc"
    Reworded -- ZooBlazer
  • That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude Thanks for another great review! I was able to do everything except put the results in pick order. -- ZooBlazer 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Support by Chompy Ace

Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by Eat Bulaga! regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 09:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Seattle Storm seasons

Nominator(s): SounderBruce 09:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

For this Leap day, I am nominating a list that involves some leaps, or rather jumps. The Seattle Storm are one of the most successful WNBA teams, with four championships to their name, and have played through 24 seasons since their debut in 2000. This list of those seasons is modeled after existing FLs on NBA team seasons as well as more recent FLs on team seasons from other sports; it is also the fourth in my series of Seattle sports team lists after the Sounders, Seahawks, and Mariners. I believe it meets FL standards but am happy to make sweeping changes where necessary. SounderBruce 09:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
    • Your date formatting is good and consistent, but could you add {Use mdy dates|date=February 2024} under the short description? That way if anybody adds sources later on it should still end up properly displaying whatever date formats they use in refs.
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
    • Seattle Times is subscription based, please use the url-access parameter to indicate this
    • Washington Post is subscription based, please use the url-access parameter to indicate this
    • Ref 17 – Work parameter should be "The News Tribune", not "The New Tribune"
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
  • Spot checks on 11 sources match what they are being cited for
    • Fixed all of the citation issues and added the mdy template. SounderBruce 17:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Other comments:

  • Season sorts funny. The cells that have a background colour are sorting to the top.
    • Added a hidden sortkey to fix it.
  • I'm thinking the rounds in the playoff results column could and probably should be sentence case instead of capitalized.
    • I am following the project norms for basketball rounds and think the title case works better here; as this issue has been particularly contentious as of late, I don't want to pick a side until the discussion is resolved.
  • What determines what order you put put names into the award column? I'm looking at 2018 specifically and it looks like they're sorted by first name, whereas 2010 doesn't follow this.
    • The sorting is based on the name of the award, which has the added bonus of putting the most important award (MVP) first.
  • Not a deal breaker at all, but would you consider adding abbreviation links in the awards column using Template:Abbrlink?
    • Added.
  • Is there another picture or two you could add?
    • I don't think there's enough room for another picture, since the table is full width on a lot of lower resolution screens.

That's all I've got. Good work! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Thanks for the review. I've replied to your comments and made the appropriate changes to the list. SounderBruce 17:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I guess I just have a large screen and see extra space for images! Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments from ZooBlazer

Overall the article looks pretty good, so I have just a few small things that I think need addressed.

  • I recommend adding archives to all the refs
    • Waiting until all of the links do get archived, as the article is new and hasn't been picked up by the bot crawlers.
  • but the team were eliminated in the Western Conference Semifinals - Should it be the team was eliminated? I know it can be kind of weird with sports teams, but "were" would make sense if it said "the Storm were eliminated", but using team, "was" definitely sounds more natural to me.
    • To maintain consistency in the use of plurals, "were" works best here.
  • I'm not sure adding the 2024 season to the table adds much at this point. At least from what I've seen from other team seasons articles, that would make more sense to add after the 2024 season
    • Removed.

That's all I have. Like I said, overall it looks good. -- ZooBlazer 01:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

@ZooBlazer: Thanks for the review, I've replied to your above comments. SounderBruce 03:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Since the only thing not done is the one that can't be done yet, I'm happy to support since archives can easily be added when possible. Good work. -- ZooBlazer 03:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


Comments

  • "based in based in Seattle, Washington" - some repeated words in there
  • "but earned the top picks in the subsequent WNBA draft for two consecutive years" => "but earned the top pick in the subsequent WNBA draft for two consecutive years"
  • That's it, I think. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Ben&Ben

Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

With my earlier nomination gaining substantial supports and a source/image review completed, here's a list of awards and nominations from a Filipino band. Ben&Ben started out as a duo before expanding into a nine-member ensemble and have released two studio albums and an extended play. Since their career began in 2016, they have earned multiple accolades for their work. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
    • Ref 2 – Needs a publish date
    • Ref 2 & 7 – Same source, please combine them
    • Ref 9 – Suuuuper minor, but can you add a period after the author's "P" initial?
    • Ref 29 – Needs an author
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
  • Spot checks on 8 sources match what they are being cited for
Thanks for catching all this silly lapses. I've fixed all Ref formatting concerns. Pseud 14 (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Other comments:

  • You used a scope of "rowgroup" in a number of places where you should have only used a scope of "row". Use rowgroup when rowspan is used and just row when it is not.
You're right, I missed to change this bit. Should be fix now.
Linked
  • "Susi" (from the Eddy Award row) is not sorting properly
Sorted
  • "Tuloy Na Tuloy Pa Rin Ang Pasko" is not sorting properly
Sorted
  • Consider running iabot, as it appears a number of the sources are down (and appropriately tagged). Would help to future proof in case more sources end up no longer being at the destination.
I ran iabot and yielded
Links analyzed: 44
Links rescued: 0
Links tagged: 0
Links archived: 0
I think the CNN Philippines source is the one that is inactive now, as it has since shut down. But the archive still works though.
  • Could you add anymore pictures? There's a lot of room beside the table and a couple of them there could be a significant improvement (not a deal breaker).
Unfortunately, there is very little in Wiki Commons to choose from. For awards list, from what I've checked, we generally do not add more than one image, as I think it tends to condense the width of the table (even those that use the collapsible infobox). [1] [2]. I think the exceptions for adding more images are list of songs, filmographies, discographies (but then again this is not a hard-and-fast rule)
  • Year column might make more sense centered (in my opinion), but not a deal breaker
I kept this one as is, since all my previous awards list, the years have not been centered, and I've also looked at similar tables of more recent FLs and they seem to be (from what I can see) acceptable even if not centered. Hope this is fine. [3] [4] [5]

That's all I've got for now. Good stuff! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your review Hey man im josh, and for catching those slips. I've addressed all comments. Let me know if I may have missed anything. Hope all is well. Pseud 14 (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'm satisfied with all the answers. Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
  • Lead: "It spawned the singles" to "It included the singles"
Done
  • Lead: "It was nominated for two Myx Music Awards with its accompanying music video" - add a comma after Music Awards. Also, "associated" or another synonym might read a bit better than "accompanying".
Dropped accompanying altogether since I think it still reads better without anything preceding it
  • Lead: "In 2023, the band was recognized with a Best Choice Award – Music at the Asia Artist Award." "Asia Artist Awards".
Done
  • Is there a better ref to replace #18, which is a post on the group's facebook page? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, none the I could find which lists every (21) nominated work. Not even in the official awards page on Facebook where this is usually posted. For some reason, in 2022, the awards org announced the nominees via a live concert event and it wouldn’t be ideal to comb through an almost 2-hour long video.
Thanks for your review MPGuy2824. I’ve addressed your comments and provided my responses. Let me know if there’s anything I may have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 04:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Support -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • I made a couple of tiny changes which it was easier just to make than to list here and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for editing and reviewing ChrisTheDude! I still miss those plural forms eh, even after working on three different articles on them, thanks for catching that. Appreciate your support as always. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Green Bay Packers draft history

Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

I recently reworked this list and split out the individual selections to Green Bay Packers draft picks (1936–1969) and Green Bay Packers draft picks (1970–present) due to page size and accessibility issues. The goal of this list is to provide a high-level summary of each Packers draft. Happy to address any issues or concerns. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "became the Packers first draft selection" => "became the Packers' first draft selection"
  • No need to link American football twice in the lead
  • "the Canadian Football League [CFL] was also included" - use normal brackets not square brackets
    • Is there a style guide related to this on Wikipedia? Most style guides recommend avoiding nested parentheses and state to use brackets on the inside of parentheses. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  • "The number of rounds peaked to 30" => "The number of rounds peaked at 30"
  • "over a 7 year period" => "over a 7-year period"
  • "selected All-Pro Dan Currie and Pro Football Hall of Famers " => "selected future All-Pro Dan Currie and future Pro Football Hall of Famers " (current wording could be taken to imply that they were already in the HoF when drafted)
  • "in 1957 with the aforementioned Hornung" - I think just "in 1957 with Hornung" is fine
  • Because the table is sortable, you need to link to List of second overall National Football League draft picks both time the Packers drafted second, not just the first time
  • "The Packers have only had the first selection in a draft twice, in 1957 with the aforementioned Hornung" - this contradicts the table, where it says they drafted 5th in that year
    • Their normal draft order that year was 4th, however as the recipient of the last "bonus lottery pick", they got a bonus 1st round pick. This is mentioned in the lead. Let me know if you think it warrants a note in the table itself (note, fifth was a typo, they were 4th). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  • That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support - the CFL in square brackets still looks odd to me but I guess it's no big deal -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey man im josh

Source review criteria and status: Passed

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
  • Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for

Source review notes:

  • I noticed Encyclopedia Britannica is Wikilinked, as are a number of other publishers. Could you Wikilink the first instance mentions for websites to keep it consistent?
  • Ref 18, 19, and 28 – All use the same publisher as the source but each one uses a different variation, one with an underscore, one with a hyphen, and one with just spaces. Please make them consistent and unlink the latter two to be consistent with your wikilinking.
  • Ref 23 – No publisher listed
  • Ref 7 – Seattle Times is subscription based, needs url-access parameter
  • Ref 7 – Add publish date

Other comments:

  • Infobox has a link to "List of first round draft picks" but the target is List of...first-round draft picks"
  • Earl Girard redirects to Jug Girard. Perhaps you should list this name there instead?
  • Vito Parilli redirects to Babe Parilli. Same comment as above.
  • Your date formatting is good and consistent, but could you add {Use mdy dates|date=February 2024} under the short description? That way if anybody adds sources later on it should still end up properly displaying whatever date formats they use in refs.

That's what I've got. I found this formatting to be interesting for draft history and preferably over a whole list of picks at that article title instead. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh, thanks for the review. I believe I have addressed all your comments except the first. This may be personal preference, but generally when I use {Cite web}, I use the website field and write out the literal website without linking. However, if I use {Cite magazine} or {Cite encyclopedia}, the link is ancillary (imho), as the work itself isn't necessarily digital. So typically in that case I would write out the work itself and link it (i.e. Sports Illustrated), because there is some relevance. {Cite web} says the work or website field is Name of the work containing the source; may be wikilinked if relevant. All this to say I think there is some wiggle room to leave the encyclopedia linked while not wikilinking anything that ends in ".com" or similar. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
@Gonzo fan2007: I respect that it's personal preference and we that we more or less focus on aiming for consistency in the formatting, but I didn't realize the logic you were using was based on the type of cite. Just for my own clarity so I know how to properly evaluate your lists moving forward, you're wikilinking in every ref that this applies to, or just the first occurrence in the type of references this applies to? I imagine some of these sources do strictly post some of their content online, but I get what you're getting at. Regarding Sports Illustrated specifically, any thoughts on the fact citation expander, in my experience, has always changed references I've used that use Sports Illustrated to cite magazine instead of cite web? Lastly, maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel be Milwaukee Journal Sentinel? Hey man im josh (talk) 16:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey man im josh, re Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, my bad. I always confuse Green Bay Press-Gazette and MJS on which has the dash. My general process (and I am sure I'm not 100% on this) is that if I am using {Cite web} to cite an exclusively online source, I typically don't link to the article (so ESPN.com and not ESPN). For other sources which were primarily offline, like magazines, newspapers, or encyclopedias, I will link every occurence in each citation (so Green Bay Press-Gazette for each citation). Does that make sense? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I noticed the one use of SI.com, I fixed that to {Cite magazine} and linked the magazine field. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Support. I understand better now about your process and stylistic choices so it should be more to the point in any future lists you nominate. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments from ZooBlazer

The article looks pretty good overall already, so my comments are probably mostly nitpicks.

  • The Packers have only had the first selection in a draft twice - You can remove "only"
  • and Tony Mandarich in 1989. The selection of Mandarich has been much maligned over the years. Of the first five picks of the 1989 NFL draft - Mostly just curious if there's a reason throughout the article why you technically link the second instance of a draft year instead of the initial one? I think in the context, readers would understand the link is for the draft, and not 1989 for instance. Not a big deal if that's just what you prefer or if that's how it is handled in NFL articles in general or something, but I figured I'd at least mention it.
    • My mo is that if I am just generally statin something happened in a year, I don't use a piped link, especially if later in the same sentence I actually state out the full name of the draft. That way the reader is clear on the link and there is no easter egg/surprise involved. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • selected over a 7-year period - Aren't single digit numbers usually spelled out?
    • Per MOS:NUMBERS, Comparable values nearby one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently. Since 10 comes a few worts earlier, 7 stays as a number. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • over 7 rounds - Ditto
    • See response above. Since 13 is right before it, 7 stays as a number. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • I bring the last two points up because in other parts of the article, you do write out the numbers such as with picks three, four and five

That's all from me. Like I said, at this point these are mostly nitpicks. Great job on the article. -- ZooBlazer 17:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I waffled a bit on whether now was the right time to submit this – I currently have another timeline FLC outstanding, which admittedly hasn't progressed as much as I would've hoped by now – but I am confident enough that this timeline meets the FL criteria that I have decided to submit it anyway. One of the things that makes the 1993 Pacific hurricane season stand out is how many of its storms went on to reach high intensities; out of 15 total storms, a whopping 60% became major hurricanes! Two of these reached maximum sustained winds of 150 mph (240 km/h), the highest of any storm this season, at the same time. While there was unfortunately some adverse impact – most notably from Hurricane Calvin, which was a disastrous event for the Manzanillo area – there were also several long-lived and powerful hurricanes that largely remained out to sea with no harm to life or property. That kind of storm is, I would like to think, any meteorologist or storm tracker's favorite type of hurricane.

This timeline was largely modeled after the 2018 and 2020 Pacific hurricane season timelines, both of which are FLs. I have worked to apply feedback from the other FLC to this timeline as well. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

  • Reliable enough for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
  • Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for

Source review comments:

  • Refs 7, 9, 10, 16, 22, 23, 24 – These refs are defaulting to the archive link in sources instead of the source that's still live. Please add <code>|url-access=live</code> to the references.
  • Ref 10 – Wikilink National Hurricane Center
  • Ref 16 – For consistency with ref 1, wikilink Miami, Florida
  • There are 34 instances where the references list "(GIF) (Report)" and 5 instances (refs 7, 10, 22, 23, and 24) where the "(GIF)" portion is listed next to the link to the original source while the "(Report)" part is listed next to the archive link. In all these instances the original sources is still live but needs that designation. For consistency, this should be fixed so that all 39 refs that use "(GIF)" and "(Report)" do so consistently.

Thanks what I've got. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for reviewing this, Josh! I believe I have addressed your comments. I actually noticed the issues you brought up in your first and fourth points in my other FLC as well, but couldn't figure out how to resolve them; I'm glad to have solutions! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I didn't realized I hadn't responded to this. Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review

Per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, the use of ";" to make psuedo-headers is not acceptable. It's ironically fixable in two opposite ways: either make them actual headers (e.g. ====June 1====), or make them actual bold text (e.g. June 1), but the semicolon is for a list thing that you're not actually doing, which messes up screen-reader software. --PresN 04:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi PresN, I appreciate you bringing this to my attention! I've replaced the semicolons with level 6 headers (the header size which looks identical to semicolon headers/bold text) and added {TOC limit|3} higher up the page. It's a different approach from the last few timeline FLs, which simply use bold text, but I figured it was one worth trying. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

50th Academy Awards

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 09:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating the 1982 Oscars for featured list because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 ceremonies were written. Birdienest81talk 09:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

MPGuy2824
  • Consider linking ABC in the lead.
  • "comedian Bob Hope hosted for the" => "comedian Bob Hope hosted the ceremony/show for the".
  • "viewers in the United States" Should end with a full stop.
  • Vanessa Redgrave is first mentioned in the "Winners and Nominees", but isn't linked there.
  • "was held at the same exact location and the same date 50 years later of the first meeting by the organization." => "was held at the same location as the first meeting by the organization, exactly 50 years later."
  • "controversy from Jewish group for its anti-Israel commentary". which Jewish group?
  • "both Jewish Defense League protestors burned" makes it seem that there were only two protestors.
  • "The Color Purple has since equaled this record with 11 nominations and no wins." to "The Color Purple later equaled this record with 11 nominations and no wins, in 1986."
  • Rest looks fine. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  • @MPGuy2824: Done - I've ready your comments and made the appropriate changes to each comment.
--Birdienest81talk 07:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
ChrisTheDude
  • "acting, directing, screenwriting for the same film" => "acting, directing, and screenwriting for the same film"
  • "And we couldn't think of anyone better than anyone better suited" - some repeated words there
  • "In celebration of both the fiftieth anniversary of both the Academy and the Oscars" - don't need to say "both" twice
  • That's all I got in addition to what MPGuy picked up -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Ffranc
  • The lead section contains original information and does not summarise the entire article. It summarises the winners but there is nothing about Redgrave's speech and the reception.
  • The article is inconsistent in its use of words and numerals for numbers. It says "50th Academy Awards" and "40th ceremony" but "nineteenth time" and "fiftieth anniversary". Considering the article title, you should probably stick to all numerals, with the exception of film titles and 0-9 (per MOS:NUMERAL).
  • The info about the original works in Best Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium is not on the Oscars.org page. You need another source.
  • The original works are inconsistently linked: the ones with a different title from the movie get a link, but not Equus (play) which also has an article.
  • Change Pentimento (book) to Pentimento: A Book of Portraits to avoid redirection.
  • Add a piped link for La Femme et le pantin/The Woman and the Puppet or change to the English title, which the Wikipedia article is under.
  • ...Redgrave remarked in her acceptance speech,"And I salute you, and I pay tribute to you, and I think you should be very proud that in the last few weeks you've stood firm, and you have refused to be intimidated by the threats of a small bunch of Zionist hoodlums." There is a space missing. It's unclear who Redgrave meant with "you" here; this could be resolved with some explanatory word or by quoting more of the speech. The quotation is cut off. According to other sources, the sentence continued: "...a small bunch of Zionist hoodlums whose behavior is an insult to the stature of Jews all over the world and their great and heroic record of struggle against fascism and oppression." Either expand it to the full sentence or make it clear that it is not the full sentence.
  • Remove unnecessary words like "moreover" and "additionally".

Nothing more that I can spot, other than the things others already have mentioned. The sources I looked at check out, with the exception of the part with the original works, and assuming good faith for all the ones I can't access. (You've written 1982 in the nomination, but the article is about the 1978 Oscars.) Ffranc (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

List of New England Patriots first-round draft picks

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

This is my 5th nomination in the NFL team's first-round picks series and I hope for it to be the 25th list in the series promoted. This is also my second nomination of an AFL team (the first being the Buffalo Bills) and, of the 9 lists I've nominated / prepared for nomination (I've got another 3 ready to nominate), this has the second most notes (to List of San Francisco 49ers first-round draft picks), which I found interesting for a team that's only been drafting since 1960.

I will, as always, do my best to respond quickly and address all comments, questions, and criticisms. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "The Patriots played their home games at various stadiums throughout Boston, including Fenway Park from 1963 to 1969 until" => "The Patriots played their home games at various stadiums throughout Boston, including Fenway Park from 1963 to 1969, until"
  • In the 2016 row there's a space in "Pick forfeited [AL]", unlike in the other rows
  • Maybe "as punishment for Deflategate" should be "as punishment for the Deflategate scandal".....?
  • That's all I got. You're certainly in a high-quality groove with these lists! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you so much for the feedback and kind words @ChrisTheDude! Gonna need to find a new set of lists once I'm done with these runs :P Hey man im josh (talk) 21:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
    Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824's comments
  • Lead image caption: " was the most recent Patriots player to be the drafted first overall." should probably be "to be drafted first overall" or "to be the first overall draft pick". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Using multi-column rows in tables ("Boston Patriots (1960–1970)" and "New England Patriots (1971–present)") really messes with their sortability. If I remember right you are supposed to add that info as a multi-row column. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
    @MPGuy2824: Thank you for taking a look at the article. The lead image caption you mentioned was definitely a mistake, which I've now fixed. Are you having issues with the sortability? I added a parameter to automatically sort the New England Patriots and Boston Patriots rows to the top when someone tried to sort a column. From what I understand this is normal and appropriate behaviour with sorting, similar to how the "No pick" rows automatically get sorted as a 0 value. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
    MOS:COLHEAD was what I was referring to. But, if the way you've done it is the current FL norm, then maybe we should look into updating the MOS? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
    Interesting, this hasn't been brought up to me before @MPGuy2824, and this isn't the first list I've included this type of split in. I think the problem is that I wanted to differentiate between the seasons under the two names, but I also want to keep the table sortable and combined. I'll go ahead and remove it Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support LGTM -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Dylan620
  • Pleased to see my home team at FLC! I'll try to get an image review done ASAP. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Looks good for the most part. The images add encyclopedic value and are positioned well; the captions are generally well-written and the alt text is sufficiently descriptive. Licensing checks out. A couple of the images had dead links for sources, so I took the liberty of heading to Commons and replacing the dead URLs with Wayback Machine archives. There are a couple things that need to be addressed before I can outright support on images:
    • During that time [Wilfork] was five-time All-Pro and five-time Pro Bowler. – according to the source, he was only All-Pro once. (An "a" would help this flow more smoothly as well.)
    • The above "during" clause, as well as During [Bledsoe's] nine seasons with the team, should be followed with commas
  • Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    @Dylan620: Thank you for the review! I definitely missed the "a" in Wilfork's blurb, I've fixed that. As for the Bledsoe blurb, I've reworded it. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    @Hey man im josh: No prob! I'm satisfied with the Bledsoe change, but there still remains the issue of the Wilfork caption not quite matching the source – specifically, the caption states that he was a five-time All-Pro, but according to the Pro-Football-Reference.com page used as a source, Wilfork was a one-time All-Pro. (I also still believe that a comma should be present after During that time, although I wonder if that may just be stylistic preference.) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    @Dylan620: Oops, sorry, missed replying to that part of your comment. I understand why you're saying that about the five-time All-Pro part, it's because of the badge at the top right of the page. That badge only refers to Associated Press first-team All-Pro selections, whereas the Pro Football Hall of Fame recognizes a number of selectors. If you scroll down on the source linked you'll see an All-Pro Teams section which shows entries for five separate years. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    @Hey man im josh: Ahhhhh I see that now, my bad! Issues resolved/clarified; support on images. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 15:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Queen of Hearts

Review coming sometime in the next three and a half hours. Queen of Hearts talk
she/they
stalk 20:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Queen of Hearts, not sure if you're still interest in providing a review, but I thought I'd send a ping in case you were. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

List of premiers of Victoria

Nominator(s): GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is a list containing so much information and history about Australian/ Victorian politics. There are very few FAs and FLs in the Victorian Politics wikiproject. (peer review) GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Most of them are fine, but the three sub-headers (Took office, etc.) need the !scope=col, and the Term of office cell should use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. ! rowspan="2" style="background:{party color|Independent politician};" scope="row" | 1 becomes !scope=row rowspan="2" style="background:{party color|Independent politician};" scope="row" | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. Along with that, you currently have two cells per row set as the header- the Premier cell should have a | instead of a !.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    Done –––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment
  • Consider moving the Electoral district/constituency to its own column. The name column is quite cluttered right now.
  • Consider mentioning that Allan is only the second woman to hold the post.
  • If you make the table sortable then List of premiers of Victoria by time in office can just be redirected here as you can get the same information by sorting on the relevant column.
  • Don't see any problems with the prose. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
    @MPGuy2824 Thank you for your suggestions. The reason I put the constituencies in the name column was to be consistent with the List of prime ministers of Australia. I am happy to change it, let me know your thoughts. I have now added the fact Jacinta Allan is the 2nd female premier of vic (this edit).
    As discussed in the peer review, making the table sortable isn't possible due to vertical cell mergers with the monarch/governor column and also for when premiers have served multiple, separate, non-consecutive, terms. GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
    • The table in the List of prime ministers of Australia is sortable and is a recent FL (from December 2022).
    • Also, to me the governor seems like a ceremonial office and not particularly relevant to this particular list. Maybe the governor/monarch column can be removed. Please take the opinion of other folk before doing this though. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
      In relation to the List of prime ministers of Australia table, when you go and sort the table, it kind of stuffs it up. I have also just discovered vertical merges around the 'Election' columns which will cause further issues if made sortable. I have tried to seek consensus in the past to remove the column without the discussion gaining any traction, I will try again in the articles talk page. GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
    By the way, List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom and List of prime ministers of New Zealand have the constituency within the name column as well, so there is precedent. Regarding the governor and monarch column, I think its important to keep the governors because the governor directly appoints the premier. I wouldn't mind removing the monarch column though. Steelkamp (talk) 03:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Support

List of Wanderers F.C. FA Cup-winning players

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Wanderers F.C. was an absolute powerhouse of the first two decades of organised association football, winning the FA Cup, the sport's earliest competition and one which is still contested and regarded as highly prestigious, five times in seven seasons before fading from the scene in the 1880s. This is a complete list of all the players who won the cup with the club. A full list of every Wanderers player can probably never be compiled due to the often ramshackle organisation and sometimes sketchy reporting and record-keeping of the early days of football, but these players who played in the cup final with the club are undoubtedly the notable ones. Comments as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh

After giving this a good look, I have a few notes:

  • "Ref(s)." should probably just be "Refs" since every cell in that column contains multiple references.
  • Is there any reason the appearances column is not sortable?
  • "Finals" -> "Final(s)" for the column name?
  • Ref 3 – There's a typo which links "Tha Guardian" instead of "The Guardian".
  • Is "Full back" meant to be "Full-back"? I ask because Full back (association football) redirects to Defender (association football)#Full-back which contains a hyphen.
  • Similarly, what's the deal with "half back"? Of the 3 players with this designation, 1 doesn't mention "half" at their article, another says "half back", and the third says "half-back". The target of the link for Half back (association football) is Midfielder#Wing-half, which doesn't help with determining the proper hyphenation.
  • Source review: Passed – all sources appear reliable enough for the information cited and the reference formatting (once that typo is fixed) is good.

Great stuff Chris! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: - thanks for your review, all addressed I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Support! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

  • and later went on serve as the president of the FA -- and later went on to serve as president of the FA
  • Although not an image review (my unfamiliarity with licensing for older images), suggest including alt text on the images.
  • That's all I got. Great to see another sport series from you on this side. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- Pseud 14 (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 02:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Cobra Kai episodes

Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because as a streaming television series this series has beat all the odds. Television series that are sequels to former film series typically don't fare well, which can be seen with the animated Karate Kid TV series. Those that do, rarely feature large appearances from the original cast. It was also essentially cancelled by YouTube yet managed to find a new service to stream on. On top of that, it survived COVID-19 and the double strikes of 2023. As the original film approaches its forty-year anniversary it feels like the proper time to nominate this. I recently expanded the lead on this, and with the addition of the sixth season table, I believe it should be a featured list. TheDoctorWho (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "Cobra Kai is an American comedy-drama and Martial arts television series" - no need for capital M on martial
  • "the first four films in The Karate Kid (franchise)," => "the first four films in The Karate Kid franchise,"
  • "picks up 30 years after 1984 titular film" => "picks up 30 years after the 1984 titular film"
  • "The series first season" => "The series' first season" (or "The first season of the series")
  • "The series first season premiered [....] and released a second season the following year on April 24" - the first season did not release the second season, so this does not make sense grammatically
  • "on the then renamed YouTube Premium" => "on the renamed YouTube Premium"
  • "as Daniel LaRusso and Johnny Lawrence, respectively" - that comma isn't needed
  • "After the series concludes, Sony is" - this doesn't really work grammatically. If I have understood the context correctly, I would suggest "Sony is developing a sixth feature film to be released after the series concludes"
  • "a sixth feature film that chronologically includes the 2010 reboot film" - the sixth film will not include the 2010 film, so this doesn't work grammatically
  • "Cobra Kai has received critical acclaim[31][32][33] receiving" - comma needed after "acclaim"
  • "with each respective seasons release" => "with each respective season's release"
  • "As of September 9, 2022, 50 episodes" - that date was nearly 18 months ago, is the sentence still accurate? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
    All done. The sentence is still accurate, per the template instructions that date should only be updated when new episodes air/release. That is the release date of the most recent season. TheDoctorWho (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. For the template you're using (in the season lists), visual captions can be added by putting |caption=caption_text in the Episode table template; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |caption={sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    Added, thanks for the reminder! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments from ZooBlazer
  • this was delayed to 2024 - The season was delayed to 2024
  • the end of the first while Thomas Ian Griffith - Add a comma after first
  • As of September 9, 2022, 50 episodes of Cobra Kai have been released, concluding the fifth season. - This can be moved to the beginning of the episodes section.
  • It should also be sourced.

That's all I have. Good work on the article. -- ZooBlazer 18:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I've addressed your first two points as well as the last one. I'm hoping the third one won't keep you from supporting? I'll move it if I have to, but it's common practice across most List of Episode pages to use this template near the end of the lead. See [6], [7], [8], and [9] which are all featured lists and have this sentence in a similar location. TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
It's all good. Support -- ZooBlazer 18:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Older nominations

List of Colorado state symbols

Nominator(s):  Buaidh  talk e-mail 18:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating this list for featured list because it is a complete, fully referenced, and well organized presentation of the symbols of this state. This list has been peer reviewed at Wikipedia:Peer_review/List_of_Colorado_state_symbols/archive1#List_of_Colorado_state_symbols Thank you,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 18:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

  • Why is the lead only one sentence? Speedy fail of criterion 2. WP:FL#United States state symbols has six that are featured, those can be starting point examples.
  • I'm not sure why this particular stamp is considered a state symbol; I found at least five other stamps [10][11][12][13][14] that are for the state. I'd remove, as well as the quarter (America the Beautiful quarters also has one for CO).
  • USS Colorado (1856) is named after the river, not the state
  • I don't think any of the List of United States Navy ships named after US states are state symbols anyway.
  • Is there a reason the "image for the motto" is just the motto in all caps, bold, and "V" for the "u"?
  • "The Centennial State" is also not an image, just use a dash if there isn't a suitable free image.
  • The citation for this nickname does not address the adoption of the nickname.
  • I would not include coat of arms as a symbol unless there is good sourcing specifically for it beyond its implicit use as part of the seal's design.
  • Footnote 1 is not loading for me.
  • I'm not sure why "United States Department of Agriculture" is the 'Adopted' for the soil. Does that mean the USDA chose this soil on the state's behalf?

Reywas92Talk 22:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. You've done a great job with the List of Indiana state symbols.
  • I've added to the lead. I'm not sure the list lead needs to contain information that is also included in the list entries themselves.
  • This is still not adequate, surely there can be other ways to summarize the topic like in the other examples.
  • I don't know what you mean by that. This stamp was issued to celebrate the state's centennial. My first linked stamp was issued to celebrate the state's 75th anniversary. I'm not convinced stamps are considered state symbols, at least not only this one in particular. The 50 State quarters honored each state with an issuance, but these also aren't the same kind of state symbols as the rest of the list, and none of the other FLs include them.
  • The entry for the USS Colorado (1856) explains that the ship was commissioned before the creation of the Territory of Colorado.
  • Right, so again, why is it listed here as a state symbol? It was named after the river, not the state, so it's not a state symbol by any stretch.
  • Right....it includes List of U.S. state ships, which are ships respective state legislatures have named as their official state ships. It's not just any ships that were named after states, a common practice by the Navy. Colorado has not designated a state ship, and I don't think the ones named after it are necessarily state symbols.
  • The state motto is in Latin and classical Latin had only one letter V. The letter V was not separated into the letter V for the consonant sound and a new letter U for the vowel sound until the Middle Ages.
  • Yes, I know that but why did you put that here? Are there any Colorado-related sources that spell it this way? Moreover, that's not an image, so why are you just restating what's in the Symbol column in the Image column?
  • I think the nickname text is adequate.
  • It says "Centennial State" in the Symbol column and then "The Centennial State" in the Image column. But that's not an image so what's the point of duplicating it?
  • I think the explanation of the nickname origin is adequate.
  • No, it's not. The citation there is simply the proclamation that verifies the date Colorado became a state, but it doesn't verify when the nickname was adopted. Did people immediately start calling the state that – What's the origin there? Also the wikilink redirects to Colorado so it's not very useful.
  • I think the explanation of the adoption of the coat of arms is also adaquate.
  • No, because when I look up CRS 24-80-901 in Lexis cited there, it just describes "Size and description of seal", not that a coat of arms was adopted. Just taking those elements from the seal doesn't mean the state has ever used a coat of arms itself, and I don't think the implicit design should be considered a symbol separate from the seal without the state having ever designated it. I add a cn tag to Seal_of_Colorado#Coat_of_arms; what use has there been besides in this 1876 book?
  • Thank you for letting me know about this. I've updated Footnote 1.
  • The Department of Agriculture has designated a state soil for each state. Please see State Soils. The Indiana state soil is Miami Soil.
  • That says "Each state in the United States has selected a state soil, twenty of which have been legislatively established." I'm assuming Colorado is not one of the legislatively established states, but that still implies the state selected it, not USDA.
  • Also, I don't think license plates count as state symbols either, these can change regularly. Reywas92Talk 15:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Again, thank you for your suggestions. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 04:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !width=140px| Type becomes !scope=col width=140px| Type. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |[[Historical armorial of U.S. states from 1876|Coat of arms]] becomes !scope=row |[[Historical armorial of U.S. states from 1876|Coat of arms]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Done.  Buaidh  talk e-mail 02:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Drive-by comment

The lead is still too short I'd say. I don't believe you saw that Reywas92 mentioned this (they didn't sign the comment, so I understand missing it) after your initial response to them. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I added a description of the creation of the first insignias of Colorado.  Buaidh  talk e-mail 03:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Mizoram Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I've brought this list up to the standard of the Tripura FL. Criticisms and suggestions for improvement are welcome. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Dylan620

I'm going to take a closer look at this in the coming days. I do have a couple comments for now:

  • and the Constitution lays down the general principles of positive discrimination for STs.[4][2]: 35, 137 – it seems a little odd that ref 4 appears before ref 2 here.
  • Mizoram was converted into a state, and the number of constituencies for its legislative assembly was increased to 40. – this should be directly followed by a source to back it up, especially since it's at the end of a paragraph.

Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Fixed these two. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you MPGuy2824. I have some more feedback:
  • The prose is generally well-written, but I see a couple incomplete sentences in the first table and would like for those to be fleshed out a bit.
    Done
  • The 2011 census of India stated that indigenous population constitute 95% of the state's total population. – mixed verb tenses here.
    Fixed
  • Images need alt text.
    Fixed
  • I am completely unable to access ref 23, which is the source for an entire column of data in the second table :/
    I've added an accessible ref for each row now.
  • It may be worth mentioning that while the legislature to make Mizoram a state was passed in 1986, the statehood was not effected until 1987.
    Done
  • In order to maintain consistency with the other refs, the websites and/or publishers should be wikilinked (if possible) in refs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (which is missing these inputs), 9, 10, and 11 (ditto).
    Fixed
  • Refs 7 and 11 have date formats which are inconsistent with the rest of the refs. You may wish to consider adding {use dmy dates|date=March 2024} to the top of the page.
    Done
  • In ref 2, I'm not sure if "Legislative Department" should be in italics.
    Fixed
  • In ref 1, the "live" URL redirects to a directory of legislative assemblies in India.
    Changed the reference
  • The article states that the assembly is elected in five-year intervals, and that is indeed the case from 1993 onward, but election intervals before then seem to be irregular. Is there a way this could be explained?
    Info added to lead. Tell me if you think it makes more sense to move the text to the History section.
  • On a less critical note, the sources that I successfully checked did verify the information they were used to cite.
That's what I've got for now. You've done a great job here, but I'm not yet at the point where I would feel comfortable supporting. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Replies inline, but I think that all the points that you brought up have been fixed now. Thanks for the thorough review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, that's much better! Thank you for addressing my concerns. Support. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

List of UEFA Champions League hat-tricks

Nominator(s): Atlantis77177 (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I had nominated this article in 2022, but it failed the criterea due to an issue in the table formatting. Now, with that sorted, I believe thee article is ready to be nominated for a Featured List spot. Special thanks to @Sdkb and @WhatamIdoing for your guidance and contributions Atlantis77177 (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Drive-by comments

@ChrisTheDude: I hope you are content with the list now--Atlantis77177 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Atlantis77177: - at this point I have literally looked at nothing except the image captions. If I get a chance to look at the rest I will do so, but it would definitely not be accurate to say that I am "content with the list now" simply because full stops have been added to the image captions -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I perfectly understand you @ChrisTheDude:. I just wanted to let you know that the problem has been sorted. Besides, this archive has been dead for like 2 weeks--Atlantis77177 (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments
  • "Ronaldo for Real against Bayern on 18 April and Atlético Madrid on 2 May 2017, the shortest gap between hat-tricks at just 14 days." – not a complete independent clause
  • "first teenager to score a hat-trick on his debut" – not sourced (the lead says he was the youngest, but other teenagers could have come before him)
  • If ref. 7 is "as of 29 November 2023", the access date should be on or after that date
    • Looks like you fixed this in one spot but not another? Refs. 7 and 23 are now the same link and should be combined with the new date (ref. 23 is the one where the access date actually matters). RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • The following names sort incorrectly: van Basten, Cole (1), Inzaghi (1), van Persie
  • Use headers in table for multiple hat-tricks by player and by club
  • No need for UEFA Champions League as a "See also" link (it's used in the article)

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@RunningTiger123: Could you explain the header point more. I didn't get it. Rest sorted. And thanks for pointing out the Rooney one. Seems, he wasn't a teen when he scored.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

The hat-tricks by nationality use cells with headers (they start with ! instead of |) – the tables by player and by club should do the same. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
@RunningTiger123: Sorted.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 03:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments
  • Image captions could have a "(pictured in xyz)" where xyz is the year, at least when the photo isn't from the era of the hat-trick. If it is within 10 years of any particular hat-trick, its probably ok.
  • Most folk seem to use the abbreviation template for "Ref." I don't know if that's a deal-breaker though.
  • Add a header for the main table. Wrap it in the sronly template, if you don't think it needs to be shown. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
@MPGuy2824: I'm not entirely sure what you meant for the last 2. Could you check if the problem is sorted.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 09:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The caption format needs to be changed to "Name (pictured in xyz) ..." where that phrase is mentioned
  • I've done this.
  • You've added "Hatricks Scored in the UEFA Champions League". This is what I meant. The word "scored" should be in lowercase though. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
@MPGuy2824: Done.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  • In the key table "Number of times player scored a hat-trick" isn't exactly right. It is a number showing that Player X did their n-th hattrick then. I'm struggling to put this in simple words that can be used in the key table though. I think you'll be to find the right words, so I support this list on prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: I have a few lines. not sure what to select. Personally, I believe the original line explains it best. But here are some of the others.

  • The player's hat-trick sequence. (Only for players who scored multiple hattricks.)
  • The count of the hat tricks scored by the player. (Only for players who scored multiple hattricks.)--Atlantis77177 (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
In cricket FL's (e.g. List of Indian Premier League five-wicket hauls and List of Indian Premier League centuries), I've seen (1/2) or (2/3) being used, with no entry in the key table. See if that works better. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: Done.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 14:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Cool, I've already supported promotion. If interest and time permit, please take a look at my FL nom. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • The lead is too long, I would cut some content. I don't think you need to list all 12 players with two hat-tricks or all 13 players to score four in a game. Cut that and then combine into fewer paragraphs.
  • "Four other players have scored multiple hat-tricks in the same season: Messi for Barcelona in both 2011–12,[11] and again in 2016–17, Gómez for Bayern, also in 2011–12, Lewandowski scored two hat-tricks for Bayern in 2021–22, and Benzema did so for Real in the same season." - this does not make grammatical sense as one sentence. Personally I think it should be split into two sentences. Also "in both 2011–12, and again in 2016–17" should be either "in both 2011–12 and 2016–17" or "in 2011–12 and again in 2016–17" but not what you have currently.
  • "The youngest scorer of a hat-trick was Raúl" vs "The oldest scorer of a hat-trick is Benzema" - why the different tenses?
  • "none were scored in 1994–95 and 2001–02 editions" => "none were scored in the 1994–95 and 2001–02 editions"
  • The superscript 4 is shown before the brackets for all players except Ronaldo
  • That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

List of heads of government of Liechtenstein

Nominator(s): TheBritinator (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

For the past year I have worked to improve this list to it's fullest potential by filling a great deal of the biographies, images and accurate information. While my work is not quite done, and may not be for a while, I believe this article fits the FL criteria in recognition of my efforts. TheBritinator (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • Lead is too short and should be expanded
  • "The head of government [....] is the title of the head of government" - this wording is quite clumsy.
  • If the title of the head of government is "head of government", where does the title "prime minister" fit in?
  • "Provincial administrator (1861–1921)" - if the translation of the German title is "state administrator", why is the heading "provincial administrator"?
  • In the Provincial administrator (1861–1921) table, why are there dashes not numbers against two of them?
  • Why are two of the cells in the first column of that table coloured?
  • "Prime Minister (1921–present)" - why is this the heading if the title of the post is "head of government"?
  • In this section, why do some of the rows not have numbers in the first column?
  • Why are some of those cells coloured?
  • Why do some of the rows have a buff-coloured background?
  • In the Deputy head of government table, what does FBP stand for? VP? VU?
  • Why is there a dagger against Nigg's date of leaving office?
  • There's only one ref in each of the first two sections - does each ref really source everything in each section?
  • There are no refs at all in the Deputy head section
  • Ref 1 has an "author" of "www 20minuten ch, 20 Minuten, 20 Min, www.20min.ch", which obviously isn't the name of the person who wrote it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
    Alright noted, those are mostly left before my time and untouched by myself, but I can get to work on that no problem. As for the "dagger", it's a cross to indicate death in office, I didn't add it, but I've also seen similar things done is contemporary articles so I paid no bother to it, could be made into a note instead however. The two administrator's with dashes were due to them being provisional or unofficial, this could also be made into a note if nessesary.TheBritinator (talk) 01:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude I have attempted to address most of the things you have pointed out, may you give an updated opinion? Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
  • "The head of government of Liechtenstein (German: Regierungschef), or informally as Prime Minister is the" Seems weird, maybe "The head of government of Liechtenstein (German: Regierungschef), known informally as the Prime Minister is the" works better.
  • "It is appointed by the sovereign". I think "They are appointed by the sovereign" works a bit better.
  • "the Landtag of Liechtenstein and is to command the confidence of both the prince and Landtag." "should command" or "is expected to command" works a bit better.
  • "but is not required to be a member of the Landtag themselves, only eligible." to "but is not required to be a member of the Landtag themselves, although they should meet the eligibility requirements for that office." or "although they have the same eligibility requirements for that office", depending on which is more accurate. Also, add a ref for this.
  • All tables need to have captions. Use the sronly template, if you think it isn't appropriate to show the caption.
  • The table in the "Deputy head of government" section could have the name column converted into a row header.
  • The use of the phrase "born-died" isn't consistent across the tables. Is this phrase even needed. Please look at a few recent-ish FLs on a similar theme and use what is used there.
  • The Monarch column in the PM section isn't the most important one and shouldn't be the row header. Maybe the name column
  • That's all I got for now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Some problems still remain:
    • The monarch column is still a header in the List of PMs.
    • In some tables the political parties have their colors next to them, while some don't. This should be consistent across the whole page.
    • In the list of deputy PMs, one of the "Independent" cells doesn't not have the right color which matches the other similar cells. You can consider using the Template:Full party name with color to keep colors consistent.
    • The first table says "born-died", while the other two say "Birth-Death" -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! rowspan=2| {abbr|No.|Number} becomes !scope=col rowspan=2| {abbr|No.|Number}. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | bgcolor="{party color|Independent politician}" |'''1''' becomes !scope=row bgcolor="{party color|Independent politician}" |'''1'''. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    @PresN I have taken the time to add these things as you have recommended. In addition, I have fixed most of the wording and citations that were pointed to me by @MPGuy2824. May you verify that I have done this correctly? I believe I have as I checked other recent FLs, but I would like to make sure. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    You missed a couple things, which I've fixed. --PresN 01:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you. TheBritinator (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Critical Role (campaign two)

Nominator(s): Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Second time nominating; since the previous nomination closed, all outstanding suggestions have been incorporated (plural verbs fixed, links to monsters/concepts added in episode summaries, additional images). In terms of major new additions, the Production and format section has been expanded with a new paragraph on filming/set design (to go with corresponding image) and there's a new subsection on the 3 specials that have since aired (with corresponding images). There are 3 new plot sums (for the specials) and the Reception section has a new paragraph on set design & objects used in play. I'm really hopeful that the episode list will be promoted this time. Looking forward to the reviews! Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho
  • "Dungeons & Dragons web series Critical Role" is a MOS:SEAOFBLUE.
    • Removed the "web series" link. Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Same with "Critical Role Productions' Twitch".
  • Any particular reason why the lead doesn't list Apha alongside Twitch and YouTube?
    • When addressing the blue links above, I rephrased to include Alpha. Let me know if it is unclear. Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
  • This is a unique article in that it uses "campaign" as a disambiguator rather than "season" or "series", I'd consider removing the season number parameter from the infobox and adding |season_name = ''Critical Role'' (campaign two) to override it, just so the infobox title matches the article title.
  • I'd also suggest adding the cast members to the infobox using the |starring= parameter.
  • The networks should be broken up using {plainlist} per the infobox instructions.
  • In the first sentence of the production section you utilize military time, but the lead uses twelve-hour time. I'd make it consistent either way.
  • Just to clarify, was there a YouTube livestream on Critical Role's channel, or was it only available there after the Twitch broadcast? If there was a YouTube livestream:
    • Was the Twitch overlay only available on Twitch or was it also available on the YouTube livestream? If it wasn't available on the YouTube livestream I'd change that portion of the sentence to read something along the lines of "but it is not available on the YouTube platform or Twitch video on demand (VOD) viewers."
      • There was a YouTube livestream so I've clarified on Twitch overlay. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Did the YouTube livestream have auto-generated captions as well? If so, "VOD" in that sentence should be replaced with "broadcast".
      • Looking at the source, it seems to just be referring to the VOD process. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
  • "Mercer is positioned behind a gamemaster's screen In the inset portion" de-capitalize "In".
  • Portions of the first few paragraphs in the production section don't feel like production information? It is relevant, but perhaps would be better suited in a "Release" or "Broadcast" section per MOS:TV.
    • Moved paragraphs 1 & 4 into a new Broadcast section. Slight rephrase. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
  • The image referencing the four-camera setup needs alt-text.
  • Wikilink Skeleton crew in the COVID section.
  • I assume DM in this section refers to Dungeon Master? If so, I would add that as an abbreviation in parenthesis in the cast section ("Campaign Two had eight cast members—seven players who form an adventuring party and the Dungeon Master (DM)").
  • Underneath the Episodes section header add {see also} and point to List of Critical Role episodes.
  • The episodes lists should utilize |LineColor = #FFDD00 so that the line color matches the table color.
  • Wikilink Streamy Awards in the Accolades section.
  • An additional link to the 11th Shorty Awards may be useful here, perhaps "Shorty Awards (11th)" or something along those lines.
  • Wikilink spin-offs in the adaptation section.
  • "sourcebook Explorer's Guide to Wildemount" is another BLUESEA.
  • References:
  • Add the following categories: Category:2018 American television seasons, Category:2019 American television seasons, Category:2020 American television seasons, Category:2021 American television seasons, Category:Television productions postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Category:Television productions suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • This article isn't about the channel itself, so I'd remove Category:YouTube channels launched in 2018

The amount of prose in this article almost leads me to suggest that it should be at WP:FAC instead, and I'd likely insist if it was a typical series with ~15-20 episodes. But with, 141 episodes I can see why it's here instead. Regardless, I commend the work that's been done here so far and want to say good work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I somehow missed it in my watchlist but I'll take a look now and start updating over the next few days. Sariel Xilo (talk) 00:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Not entirely sure how to add alt text to the 4-cam image since that's not parameter in Template:Image frame; the example uses |base_alt= but that didn't work when I tried it. If I have time tomorrow, I'll take a look at some of the image template options to see how to fix it. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
If you set it up like this: [[File:Critical_Role_C2E98_"Dark_Waters"_screenshot.png|250px|thumb|right|Four camera layout during an ocean battle scene in the Episode: "Dark Waters".***INSERT CITATION HERE (''I had to take it out of the code box due to errors, it's the same citation currently cited in the article'')***|alt=InsertAltTextHere]] it should work. The "thumb" in the link makes it a thumbnail identical to the frame template. Unbulleted list appears the same as plainlist, and is given as an option in Infobox instruction so that works for me! That said, it doesn't need updated to plainlist, but if you're curious; I believe the only reason that plainlist didn't work for you is because the bulletpoints (*) have to be flush with the left side of the code editor, you can see an example with this article and can see how it appears in the editor. Given the updates made, I'm inclined to support assuming that the alt text and references sections are dealt with. Once again, fantastic work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining the code issues! I always forget that the bullet points can be persnickety. I've updated the image format & added the alt text. I'll ping when I'm done with the references. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
@TheDoctorWho: I believe I fixed all the refs (except 46 which doesn't have an author). I relied on ctrl-f to find the ones you called out but I sometimes transpose lines when working in the source so I would appreciate a double check to make sure I didn't miss any. Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Looks great! Apologies on 46, not sure what happened there. Striking what I said above since all of my comments have been addressed to reiterate my Support. Best of luck with any future reviews! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. For the template you're using, visual captions can be added by putting |caption=This is a caption in the Episode table template; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |caption={sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    @PresN: I looked at the tutorial but I'm not entirely sure if what I did is enough. I added |caption={sronly|List of episodes in 2018} in the first episode table which is similar to the caption in the episode table at Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (season 1). If that caption is enough, I'll replicate it in the other tables. But if not, I would appreciate additional guidance. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    Yep, that works fine, though it turns out this template works differently than others, and the "sronly" isn't needed, as the caption is always hidden- so you can do just "|caption=List of episodes in 2018" if you want. --PresN 04:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    Cool! I removed the "sronly" & added captions to all of the episode tables. Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in South Africa

Nominator(s): Tone 16:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

South Africa is the country with the second-highest number of WHS in Africa (Ethiopia, with one more, is already seeing some support, so I am adding a new nomination). Standard style. 10 sites and two tentative ones, so this is a medium-sized list. Again, suggestions about which list to nominate next are welcome ;) Tone 16:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "The San people who lived in the area for more than four millennia, created" => "The San people, who lived in the area for more than four millennia, created"
  • "Kingdom of Mapungubwe was" => "The Kingdom of Mapungubwe was"
  • "The area is remarkably rich in biodiversity, even if it covers less than 0.5% of Africa, it is home to 20% of plan species of the continent." => "The area is remarkably rich in biodiversity: even though it covers less than 0.5% of Africa, it is home to 20% of plan species of the continent."
  • "Vredefort Dome (satellite image pictured) is the" => "The Vredefort Dome (satellite image pictured) is the"
  • "Even if the structure has been deeply eroded" => "Although the structure has been deeply eroded"
  • "a lifestyle that has been in past much more widespread" => "a lifestyle that was in the past much more widespread"
  • "provide insight in the time where the first" => "provide insight into the time when the first"
  • "The rocks document lave flows" => "The rocks document lava flows"
  • "around 200 000 years ago" => "around 200,000 years ago"
  • "provide insight into life of these people" => "provide insight into the life of these people" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all, thanks! Tone 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

AK

  • Did a c/e to fix more minor issues.
  • "the anti-Apartheid activist, who later became the president of the country" to "the anti-Apartheid activist and future president of the country"?
  • "not appropriate for agriculture" to "unsuitable for agriculture"?
  • That's all I have, nice work on this list. AryKun (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for checking! I fixed the agriculture as you suggested, for Mandela I think the original wording is somewhat better. Tone 16:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
    Support on the basis of prose from me. AryKun (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Dylan620

I will review this in the near future with a probable focus on images. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season

Nominator(s): ''Flux55'' (talk), Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

This timeline was created by Flux55, a promising new user who has already done a lot of good work. 1991 was a quiet year for Atlantic hurricanes, but don't tell that to anyone in New England! Hurricane Bob caused extensive damage and over a dozen fatalities when it scraped up the East Coast and plowed into Rhode Island at Category 2 strength—it's still the most recent New England hurricane landfall. Also of note was the infamous Perfect Storm, which became a large, powerful, and damaging nor'easter after it ate Hurricane Grace for dinner... and then itself became a hurricane before making landfall in Canada as a weakened system! I'm proud of the work Flux and I put into this, and we look forward to the community's feedback. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Comment A spot check found multiple distance and location Statements which are not stated or supported by the referenced source. If a TCR or other reliable secondary source does not mention something the statement needs to be removed. Drdpw (talk) 02:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
@Drdpw: I understand where you're coming from. I was attempting to follow the standards of the Timeline of the 2020 Pacific hurricane season (which, according to the featured list log, is the most recent season timeline to be promoted to featured status). There, every single event in a system's life—be it formation, change in category, landfall, peak intensity, or dissipation—is given a location compared to a city, island, or other landmark, even if such comparisons were not explicitly drawn in the TCRs for those systems. I have also observed this being the case, from a spot-check of a few timeline details, with the 2020 ATL and 2018 EPAC timelines. If removal of the details in question from the 1991 ATL timeline is required, then I am willing to do so, but I was under the impression that I had been following recent best practice. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 19:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
I think I've asked this before and was told it was a matter of WP:CALC to measure the great circle distance between two points, using the NHC's coordinates for storm location. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 22:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
We can use, for example, NOAA's Latitude/Longitude Distance Calculator to calculate the distance between two points. But we cannot state that a system is about "X" miles from "Y" land point unless that land point is specifically mentioned somewhere in the referenced article. The 2023 Atlantic and 2023 Pacific hurricane season timelines, currently undergoing revision as new TCRs are published, are good examples of how TL content can be limited when limited information is available. Drdpw (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
@Drdpw: Got it, that makes sense; I'll go back and make adjustments after breakfast and coffee. Should be able to finish this evening. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 12:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC) (updated 17:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC))
@Drdpw and KN2731: Okay, I think I've got it all—how's it look now? Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
@Drdpw and KN2731: Just making sure you've seen this – would appreciate your feedback on the fixes I've made. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I did; you have addressed issues that would be cause for immediate dismissal of candidacy by a reviewer. It looks ready for a reviewer's examination. Drdpw (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by AndrewPeterT

Hello, Dylan! This is Andrew444 from Wikia! It is so nice to see you again after all these years still interested in tropical cyclones! Anyway, I am going to do my best to evaluate this list for featured criteria. I would ask that other comments elaborate on the points I bring up wherever possible:

1. Prose - I appreciate that there is plenty of meteorological jargon appropriately used in the timeline, yet the language remains accessible for everyone. I also see no obvious grammatical errors, and the page "feels" objective and encyclopedic when I read it. I would also like to offer the following content-related feedback:

  • I notice that the four-digit pressure readings are written with commas. This is not the stylistic preference I see from the National Hurricane Center in their advisories and tropical cyclone reports. What is the rationale for including commas in these measurements?
    I stated above that I tried to model this timeline after 2020 EPAC – I observed the minimum pressure statements in that one and thought, "huh, I guess we're adding the commas now!" Of the three promotions which preceded it (in reverse order: 2020 ATL, 2018 EPAC, 2019 ATL), only 2018 EPAC excludes the commas. In other words, I kept the commas so as to follow what I perceived to be recent convention. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  • There are no links to the Tropical Storm Danny, Tropical Storm Erika, and Tropical Depression Ten sections of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season article in the timeline prose. Could these links be added for consistency?
    Done, done, and done. I'm not sure how I missed the lack of links for Erika and 10L – good catch! A link to Tropical Storm Danny (1991) (which redirects to the relevant section on the season article) had been present, but I switched it out with a direct link per your comment; I've also done the same with Claudette and Fabian. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  • I note that the prose insinuates that Tropical Storm Erika became extratropical as a tropical storm. Yet the track image shows that Erika weakened into a tropical depression before becoming extratropical. Which of these scenarios actually occurred?
    I'm a little embarrassed to have not picked up on this discrepancy myself. This appears to be a case where the TCR (the source provided for the text of this event in the timeline) is at odds with HURDAT (the source for generating the track maps). A discussion at Talk:Hurricane Luis#Winds a few years ago seemingly concluded that the TCR takes precedence over HURDAT. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
@Dylan620: Is there a way for a footnote to be added explaining this discrepancy you mention in this post? I was not aware of these conflicting conventions myself, and I would assume other readers would not be, either. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
@AndrewPeterT: Footnote added. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

2. Lead - I defer to another editor on whether or not the first few paragraphs satisfy the fine print of WP:MOSLEAD. However, I can say that the page nicely includes the "standard explanatory text" for hurricane season timelines. I also really like how the second paragraph summarizes the major impacts of Hurricane Bob and the 1991 Perfect Storm. That being said, I do have the following feedback:

  • Unlike some other season timelines, the lede does not define what an "average Atlantic hurricane season" entails. Could a footnote be added explaining this terminology?
    Footnote added. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Could we add somewhere in the last two paragraphs that one-minute sustained winds are used to measure the wind speeds of North Atlantic tropical cyclones?
    I've added a brief mention near the end of the lede. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Even though the lead should be a summary, I do feel that the sinking of the Andrea Gail by the 1991 Perfect Storm is too significant to ignore. Perhaps a sentence can be added explaining how a book and film were made about this event (as to engage readers with little background in tropical cyclones)?
    Sentence added. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

3. Comprehensiveness -

(a) In general, the page does a great job describing when each tropical cyclone "changed" Saffir-Simpson scale categories and made landfall. Pass on this criterion.

(b) I do not see any statements that must be cited per WP:MINREF. However, I would like to contest the following claim made in the timeline:

  • In the July 6 entry, it says that

Tropical Depression Two makes landfall near La Pesca, Mexico with winds of 35 mph (55 km). Its only known barometric pressure measurement of 1,007 mbar (29.74 inHg) is taken around this time.

The corresponding cited source from the National Hurricane Center only states the 1007 mbar reading. It never says this reading was the only measurement taken from the depression. Could either another source be found for the latter sentence or the latter sentence be removed altogether?

I worded this the way I did because HURDAT does not list any pressure values for the system; neither do the advisories, with the sole exception of the one cited as a source for the measurement. I've rephrased this to remove the statement of the measurement being the only one, while still keeping mention of the 1,007 mbar value. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

(c) I will defer to other editors on whether this page meets the criteria of WP:STANDALONE and WP:CFORK. That being said, I can say that while some large chunks of language do seem to be very similar to other Atlantic hurricane season timelines (e.g. that of 1992), I can tell that the specific wording is customized specifically for the 1991 season. Finally, because of how much specific detail is present about formations, dissipations, and other key events of all the storms, I would argue content would be lost if we tried to merge the timeline into the general season article. With that, I say pass on this criterion.

4. Structure - I greatly appreciate the consistent layout of the timeline. Readers like me can easily follow along as the days and months of the 1991 season progress. Pass on this criterion.

5. Style - I defer to other editors on whether your work fully meets the criteria of the WP:MOS. However, I can say the following:

(a) Visual appeal - I am happy to see the lack of red links. Also, the visual timeline, like it does on other WP:WPTC articles, provides a great and simple color-coding scheme for readers to digest and visualize different storms' intensities. Pass on this criterion.

(b) Media files - Great work providing images with concise captions scattered throughout the list, especially the visual of the Perfect Storm absorbing Grace! And since all the images are free use, no need to worry about non-free use rationales! That being said, I would like to see a satellite image or track of Tropical Storm Danny somewhere in the article. Also, what is the rationale for some storms having satellite imagery but others having tracks?

I've added a satellite image of Danny, while also switching out Ana's image for its track and Fabian's track for an image of the storm. I included both satellite images and tracks pretty much just for variety's sake, though I did try to prioritize track images for storms which lacked location comparison points in their TCRs. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

6. Stability - Looking through the edit history, I notice that most of the edits from the past month are revisions that you have made, several of which are in response to the feedback Drdpw and others gave above. This page seems satisfactorily stable for a FL.

I will offer my formal support once all of my concerns have been addressed. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. I wish you and Flux55 the best with this process. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

One last piece of feedback for now: In your nomination blurb, I would encourage you to clarify that the Perfect Storm eating Hurricane Grace is a reference to the Fujiwhara effect. Not everyone may understand that figurative language. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 02:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, it's great to hear from you – I never knew you had a Wikipedia account! Thank you so much for taking the time to review this! I have a busy day in meatspace today, but I'll try to address your concerns after work tomorrow. Regards, Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much for addressing my feedback, Dylan. I now support this page becoming a featured list. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much Andrew :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • "The third tropical depression of the season forms from an area of low pressure offshore the Bahamas" - is this a valid Americanism? In UK English we would say "off the shores of the Bahamas" or simply "off the Bahamas" but never "offshore the Bahamas". But maybe it is valid in American English.......?
  • Prince Edward Island is mentioned but never linked
  • That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your feedback Chris! I've reworded the bit that you quoted about Bob's formation, and added a link to the PEI article. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 14:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Co-nom update

I note with great sadness and disappointment that my co-nominator, Flux55, turned out to be a sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. I am still able and willing to address any feedback for this nomination, and I hope this can still pass through the FLC process. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility review

Per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, the use of ";" to make psuedo-headers is not acceptable. It's ironically fixable in two opposite ways: either make them actual headers (e.g. ====June 1====), or make them actual bold text (e.g. June 1), but the semicolon is for a list thing that you're not actually doing, which messes up screen-reader software. --PresN 04:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi PresN, I appreciate you bringing this to my attention! I've replaced the semicolons with level 6 headers (the header size which looks identical to semicolon headers/bold text) and added {TOC limit|3} higher up the page. It's a different approach from the last few timeline FLs, which simply use bold text, but I figured it was one worth trying. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 16:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches

Nominator(s): – PeeJay 17:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it has been 14 years since it was last nominated. The nomination only failed at the time because of the arbitrary ruling that seven items was not enough to constitute a valid content fork. However, the combination of the Vikings now having had 10 head coaches and that also no longer being a rule means it should pass easily this time. All of the Featured List criteria are satisfied. I look forward to seeing this pass as an FL soon. – PeeJay 17:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • "There have been ten head coaches in the history of the franchise" vs "Les Steckel has the worst winning percentage of the franchise's nine head coaches".......?
    • Good spot, thanks.
  • "On January 15, 2014, the Vikings appointed [....] and served...." - the Vikings did not serve
    • Reworded.
  • "Two days after he won the Super Bowl as the Los Angeles Rams" - wikilink both Super Bowl and Rams
    • Reworded and linked.
  • "making Grant the first head coach to lead teams to four Super Bowls, despite never winning one." - slightly vague wording here - was he the first HC to lead teams to four Super Bowls, or the first to lead teams to four Super Bowls but not win any of them?
    • It's the former. I'll work on rewording this.
  • "the team had their worst season to date, only managing to win three of their 16 games" - earlier you mentioned a season when they only won two games, surely that is worse?
    • The season when they won two games had fewer games in total, so the winning percentage was higher. I've clarified that the three-win season is their worst by win percentage.
      • Unless my long-ago A-level maths is massively failing me, 2 wins out of 14 games is a 14.3% winning percentage, and 3 wins out of 16 games is 18.8%, so the former is definitely worse......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
        • Nope, you're right. For some reason, I thought it was 2 wins in a 12 game season, and that still isn't better. I think the fact we were actually going for was that the three-win season was the worst in a 16-game campaign. Now that the season is 17 games long (why?!), I might just dispense with that stat. – PeeJay 21:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  • "making Green the first African-American head coach" - in the lead African American did not have a hyphen.......?
    • Removed hyphen.
  • "Since Childress' first season in charge, the Vikings regular season record" => "After Childress' first season in charge, the Vikings' regular season record"
    • Reworded.
  • "twice in two consecutive years" - the word "two" is redundant here
    • Reworded.
  • Philadelphia Eagles is linked twice in the lead
    • Fixed.
  • "Last" column doesn't sort correctly
  • That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
    • Cheers Chris. I'm working on fixes for the last two things. – PeeJay 11:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
      @ChrisTheDude: I think I've addressed all your concerns now. – PeeJay 19:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey man im josh

Haven't done a deep dive just yet, but I have some comments:

  • List needs work to meet accessibility needs. See PresN's standard comment here for some advice.
    • Done.
  • Images need alt text
    • Done.
  • What verifies the number of division titles?
    • The Pro-Football-Reference link for each coach includes a season-by-season table with a column titled "Rank", which shows the team's position in their division under the coach each year.
  • Should the yrs column be changed to season instead? I think it makes more sense because of cases like Mike Zimmer, who was fired on January 10, 2022, and coached a game the day before, but is listed as having coached until 2021.
    • Done.
  • I think there should be a win % column for the playoffs as well, given that there's one for the regular season. (Personal note: It looks like other head coach lists are inconsistent, with 7 of the 22 promoted head coach lists including the playoff win % column, I think I may have to fix that some day.)
    • Done. I've also added a set of columns giving each coach's overall record (regular season plus playoffs).
  • For the "Elected into the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a coach and spent entire NFL head coaching career with the Vikings" coaches, you should a single symbol instead of two. I recommend removing the asterisk and just using the dagger
    • Since this is a combination of two other criteria, I think it's important to retain both symbols, especially since both symbols are already used for their own purposes.
  • This is very minor, but I think one of the two "Elected into the Pro Football Hall of Fame", background colours should be changed to make them a bit more different (not two shades of yellowish)
    • I'm not sure what this should be changed to. What do other articles use?

It's on the right track and I'm glad to see you nominated this PeeJay! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Cheers. I've responded as best I can to your comments. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. – PeeJay 19:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey @PeeJay, I'm sorry for my delayed response, I wasn't aware you had responded to me, please ping me next time for a faster response. I think that the alt text for the images needs work. One example is the alt text for Jerry Burns, which reads "A white man in a suit and tie, holding a piece of paper", but the alt text would be better if it were Jerry Burns in a suit and tie, holding a piece of paper. You use similarly phrased alt text on all of the images in the table and I think the alt text should just use the person's name instead. The alt text is fine otherwise. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Cool, I've fixed the alt text. I also raised some questions above regarding the colours and symbols used in the list key. Thanks for helping to clean up the references, by the way. – PeeJay 18:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
@PeeJay: One of the yellows is fairly commonly used, but I think you may just need to pick a different colour, as I'm not sure there's a lot of situations where coaches were elected into the hall as a player. It's a minor knit pick, so I'm not stuck on it. I'll support. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments from Gonzo_fan2007
  • Why are Ties not sortable?
    • They are now. Not sure why the table I originally plagiarised didn't make them sortable.
  • Increase size of photos to 100px, they are barely readable.
    • Increased to 80px as a compromise.
  • Most of the info in the Legend is self-explanatory. Utilize {Abbr} for "GC", "W", "L" and "T" in the table. Use {Abbrlink} for Win%. "Seasons", "First" and "Last" are so self-explanatory that Legend clarification isn't necessary.
    • I'm not sure I agree with this. Using {abbr} and {abbrlink} reduce accessibility for people who are browsing on mobile devices or using screen readers.
      • "Seasons", "First" and "Last" are basic English words that are self-explanatory. These should be removed from the Legend or you should add every column header to the legend ("Name", "Image", ""Accomplishments" etc). If you really feel like something needs explained, then add a note like you do after "Term" (note that if any word needs a definition in the key, its "Term", which isn't a word I commonly associate with NFL head coaches). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
        • Fair enough. Done. – PeeJay 14:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Use {Win-loss record} for any records in the text or notes.
    • Done.
  • Ref 42 isn't archived.
    • Someone replaced it when they made an edit in the last couple of weeks, so I've restored the old ref.
  • Remove "elected to HoF as player" as not relevant to this list.
    • I think it's important to note that Norm Van Brocklin is in the Hall of Fame but not for his time as a coach.
      • Then just add a note. The color choice is too close to the other to really differentiate it anyways. Again, its not pertinent to this list. It would be liking adding Bart Starr's MVP award to List of Green Bay Packers head coaches. Interesting? Maybe. Germane to the topic of the article? Not really. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
        • Fair enough, it's gone. – PeeJay 14:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
  • I also don't understand why "Spent entire NFL head coaching career with the Vikings" is important enough to have a color coding. I may be in the minority on that point.
    • I think it's interesting to note how many Vikings head coaches have only ever coached one team. I don't know how it compares to other teams, but this is an interesting point IMO.
  • I feel like the history section is a bit excessive. It's physical length is almost as long as the table today.
    • That's bound to happen as history progresses.
      • Then this level of detail should be moved to another article, maybe on the History of the Minnesota Vikings. The focus of any list article should be the list. This falls under FLCR 3(c) and to an extent 4. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
        • I'll see what I can do, but I don't think there's anything in there that warrants removal. Give me some time. – PeeJay 14:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
          • Here's an example: With six minutes left in the fourth quarter and the Vikings in the lead at 27–20, they drove down the field to set up a 38-yard field goal for kicker Gary Anderson, who had not missed a single kick all season. A successful kick would have given the Vikings a two-score lead with just over two minutes left to play, but Anderson hooked his kick wide left, allowing the Falcons to take the ball back downfield for a game-tying touchdown. They followed this with a field goal in overtime, denying the Vikings a fifth Super Bowl appearance. - None of this has to do with "Vikings head coaches".
          • Another example: The Vikings again improved to 11–5 in 2015, beating the Packers in week 17 to win the NFC North for the first time since 2009 and snapping a streak of five consecutive titles by Green Bay; however, they went on to lose to the Seattle Seahawks in the wildcard round of the playoffs. After going 5–0 to start the 2016 season (which was their first season in their newly completed U.S. Bank Stadium) despite a slew of injuries, the team won just three games after their bye week and finished 8–8. - again, nothing to do with head coaches and more appropriate for History of the Minnesota Vikings or Minnesota Vikings seasons.
          • I will also note that the numerous times the history section goes into unnecessary detail about individual seasons and reads more as a history of the vikings than as a history of their head coaches. An example of the skewed mnature of some of this text is the sentence Nine more divisional titles followed in the next 11 seasons, including NFC Championships in 1973, 1974 and 1976, making Grant the first head coach to lead a team to four Super Bowls, although he won none of them., one sentence for 11 seasons (and the most successful at that), whereas we have a paragraph on Van Brocklin's first 3 and 3 whole paragraphs to cover the most recent 23 seasons. It's all too much and needs to be more focused on the topic at hand. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Are the stats updated as of Week 15? If so, update them.
    • The person who updated the stats didn't update the "as of" line. Fixed.
  • The section title for the table should be "Head coaches"
    • Done.

That's it for now. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your input User:Gonzo fan2007. Let me know if you need anything else addressed. – PeeJay 14:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Specific responses above. Also, the "3" column should be sortable. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
What's the "3" column? – PeeJay 14:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, slip of the keyboard. The "#" column. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh I see. Yeah, I guess I can do that. – PeeJay 14:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
@Gonzo fan2007, @PeeJay, I added sorting to the column to move things along. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Sorry I've been snowed under with extracurricular stuff recently and haven't been able to focus on this nomination. I'll try to give the "History" section a trim before the end of the week. – PeeJay 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
@PeeJay: Reminding you of this. --PresN 20:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Reluctant oppose with no movement on actionable comments in a month I must reluctantly oppose for now. Happy to reconsider if the history section is significantly trimmed. I'll state again, none of the other "head coaches" FLCs go into anything close to this level of detail. I noted specific examples above, but overall the history section comes across as a history of the franchise, with undo weight on specific parts. If a history section is included (which I don't necessarily agree with), it should focus more specifically on a general overview of the team's head coaches. Summary sentences that cover a head coach's tenure instead of play-by-play coverage of important games. Please ping me if edits are made and you would like me to reconsider PeeJay. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
@PeeJay: Second ping. --PresN 14:59, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University

Nominator(s): User4edits (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Nominated for GA in the past, returned for FL, improved on the article (generally and as per GA review), and nominating for FL now. Thanks,User4edits (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by RunningTiger123

Addressed comments. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Images should have alt text (see MOS:ALT)
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Alt text still needed in infobox. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Done User4edits (talk) 03:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  • A few places use "vice chancellor" instead of "vice-chancellor" – either one is fine, but it should be used consistently
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Three images in the infobox is probably too many – suggest removing the flag
as per Template:Infobox official post, see POTUS, PMoUK, PMoI. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Infoboxes don't have to use every possible parameter. Also, the examples provided have flags and seals that (a) differ significantly and (b) have their own articles. The flag and seal here are similar and aren't particularly notable, so they provide decoration more than anything. That's why I think one should be removed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Removed seal of Univ. Left flag as flag pertains more to the Office. User4edits (talk) 03:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Dates should not start with a zero, i.e., "7 January 2022" instead of "07 January 2022" (MOS:DATE)
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • "derives his powers" → "derives their powers" to match pronoun usage elsewhere
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • "which shortlists few candidates" – "few" is redundant for a shortlist
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • "in the chronological order" → "in chronological order"
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Remove column headers from the middle of the table (MOS:COLHEAD)
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • If ref. 16 is the citation supporting all dates, it needs to be referenced after the most recent president took office.
Seems this was accidentally overlooked – still needs to be addressed. (Ref. 56 covers all presidents and could be used in place of the now-outdated ref. 16.) RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
@RunningTiger123: Done. User4edits (talk) 11:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
  • What is the source for who appointed the vice-chancellors?
source added User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
My mistake, I wasn't clear – what is the source that these individuals were in office at the time to make the appointments? (If there isn't a source naming the presidents/governors-general who appointed the vice-chancellors, it may not be particularly relevant information.) RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
It is based on corresponding Office held in the duration of the appointment, can be removed (by adding the Governor General information in the text). User4edits (talk) 03:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Unless the appointments have been made for overt partisan reasons, I think removing that column is probably best. RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
No the appointments are made by the President of India as an institution and not much as personal choice. Done. User4edits (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
  • What is the source for the various remarks? (some have references but not all)
Added User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced remarks still present for Sunder Lal, Govind Malaviya, Rao, and Lalji Singh. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Done User4edits (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Sunder Lal: "Vice-chancellor" should not be capitalized
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Merge the two cells with the Lord Chelmsford for consistent formatting with other cells
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Madan Mohan Malaviya: Remark should not end in a period (not a complete sentence)
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Radhakrishnan: "Served as university's Vice-Chancellor for more than 8 years." – redundant to table, why is this relevant? (Also, "Vice-Chancellor" should not be capitalized, and statement should not end in period)
Two long stints, of Madan Mohan Malviya and Radhakrishnan have been highlighted in remarks. Rest, Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Govind Malaviya, Shrimali, Rao, Lalji Singh: "Alumni" → "Alumnus" (singular)
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Dhar, Lalji Singh, Tripathi: Remarks should not end in a period
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • For Jain: "from 3 to 6 after 5 years" → "from third to sixth after five years"
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
    • Also, I'm confused – is the implication that the drop was Jain's fault? He hasn't been there for five years.
The ranking has been All-India third for five years, in Jain's term it dropped to sixth. The same has been mentioned for DP Singh as well when it ranked 1. User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I think it would be clearer to say the year it dropped from third to sixth. Or maybe something like "NIRF ranking of the university dropped to sixth after five years in third". RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
@RunningTiger123:Regarding the year, it is understood that it would pertain to the tenure (as in DP Singh). I think NIRF ranking of the university dropped to sixth after five years in third would appear more confusing to Indian english readers. User4edits (talk) 03:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  • No need to capitalize "Seat", "Office", or "Vice-Chancellor" in the image captions under Timeline
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • "Madan Mohan Malviya resigns" → "Madan Mohan Malviya resigned"
Done User4edits (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I'll provide a source review shortly. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Source review:

Addressed comments. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  • A lot of links are dead. Either replace them or check a digital archive like the Wayback Machine. WP:IABOT may help with this.
Done User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Refs. 3 and 4 are insufficient to prove an official abbreviation – Twitter handles are usually abbreviated
Done in the lead with two reliable sources. Subsequently, removed cit. from the infobox. User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Refs. 11, 32, 36, 42, 46, 47: Use |trans-title= (and note language if not already done)
Done User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Refs. 18, 21: The Times of India has reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable (WP:TOI). I would suggest using better sources.
I am aware of WP:TOI and had used it only as plain non-conflicting sources. I have removed all except one, which seems hard to replace as TOI is the only major publication doing depth reporting from the city concerned. User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Ref. 22: Is a stamp archive the best source for this?
Two RS added. User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Formatted, another source added. User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Another source added. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@RunningTiger123: For your attention, please. User4edits (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

Addressed comments.
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {sronly|caption_text} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !{abbr|No.|Number} becomes !scope=col | {abbr|No.|Number}. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. !1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 18:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
    • First, Done
    • For the rest, I am not very technically aware, nor can I comprehend MOS:DTAB exactly, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks,
    User4edits (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
    @PresN: please see the reply, thankyou, User4edits (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
    Fixed it for you. --PresN 17:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Image review from Z1720

  • File:Sudhir K Jain Potrait.png: needs to be reviewed to ensure that it complies with copyright laws concerning publications from India. See its description page on meta for more information.
  • File:Sivaswami Aiyar.jpg: needs a United States public domain tag. See its page description for more details
  • File:Mahamana Madan Mohan Malaviya Portrait.jpg needs a United States public domain tag. Also, what makes the website a reliable source to know that this image is this person?
  • File:Photograph of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan presented to First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy in 1962.jpg: the link to the source does not lead to the image. Can this be rectified?
  • File:Amarnath Jha VC-BHU.jpg: the link and the data on its description page do not indicate which page number the image is from in the source. This should be included.
  • File:Narendra Deva 1971 stamp of India.jpg: Needs to be reviewed to ensure that the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:CPRamaswami Aiyar 1939.jpg: url to verify the source is broken.
  • File:Veni Shankar Jha VC-BHU.jpg: source url should include a page number
  • File:N.H. BHagwati VC-BHU.jpg: source url should include a page number
  • File:Triguna Sen 2010 stamp of India.jpg: Needs to be reviewed to ensure that the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:Professor Amar Chand Joshi.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:Kl shrimali.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:Moti Lal Dhar.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:Professor Hari Narain.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
  • File:Iqbal Narain.png: What is the source for this image? Where was it published?
  • File:Raghunath Prasad RP Rastogi.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
  • File:Hari Gautam VC-BHU.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
  • File:Prof. Y.C. Simhadri VC-BHU.png: Needs to be reviewed.
  • File:Patcha Ramachandra Rao.jpg: Summary needs more information
  • File:Dr. Panjab Singh.jpg: Needs to be reviewed
  • File:Prof. D.P. Singh Director NAAC Vice Chancellor Banaras Hindu University.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
  • File:Girish Chandra Tripathi.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
  • File:Rakesh Bhatnagar 27th Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University.png: The listed source is another Wikipedia page, which is not a valid source. This needs to be fixed.
  • File:Sudhir K Jain Potrait.png: Needs to be reviewed.

Please ping when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

  • File:Sudhir K Jain Potrait.png: needs to be reviewed to ensure that it complies with copyright laws concerning publications from India. See its description page on meta for more information.
Available at provided url: https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/Gallery/PhotoGallery/2021/Nov/H20211108103573.JPG, Press Information Bureau & President's Secretariat Government of India are covered under given license there.
  • File:Sivaswami Aiyar.jpg: needs a United States public domain tag. See its page description for more details
PD-US added.
  • File:Mahamana Madan Mohan Malaviya Portrait.jpg needs a United States public domain tag. Also, what makes the website a reliable source to know that this image is this person?
PD-US addded. The wesbite is the mother institution (which is also founded), please see [15] and Mahamana.
  • File:Photograph of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan presented to First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy in 1962.jpg: the link to the source does not lead to the image. Can this be rectified?
Done. New link added to File.
  • File:Amarnath Jha VC-BHU.jpg: the link and the data on its description page do not indicate which page number the image is from in the source. This should be included.
direct link Pg 768 added to source.
  • File:Narendra Deva 1971 stamp of India.jpg: Needs to be reviewed to ensure that the India pd tag is valid.
direct link to *.gov.in domain added. GODL-India applies, not PD-IN.
  • File:CPRamaswami Aiyar 1939.jpg: url to verify the source is broken.
Fixed with [Archived link]
  • File:Veni Shankar Jha VC-BHU.jpg: source url should include a page number
direct link pg 840 added.
  • File:N.H. BHagwati VC-BHU.jpg: source url should include a page number
direct link, pg 848/pg 979 added.
  • File:Triguna Sen 2010 stamp of India.jpg: Needs to be reviewed to ensure that the India pd tag is valid.
direct link *.gov.in added, GODL-India applies.
  • File:Professor Amar Chand Joshi.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
direct link added, person born in 1908, died in 1971, photo must be of early 30s-40s. The publisher institution is of Dept. Science & Technology, Govt. of India, so GODL-India applies too.
  • File:Kl shrimali.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
Source is deprecated. Person's photo is on Parliament website's profile where he entered 1952 and left 1962, Therefore, PD applies. PD-US added.
  • File:Moti Lal Dhar.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
Sourced from [www.insaindia.res.in] where person was elected in 1960, born 1914, photo looks like someone in 40-50s. PD-India applies. Also, since The publisher institution is of Dept. Science & Technology, Govt. of India, so GODL-India applies too. PD-US added.
  • File:Professor Hari Narain.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
File present at source link. he publisher institution is of Dept. Science & Technology, Govt. of India, so GODL-India applies.
  • File:Iqbal Narain.png: What is the source for this image? Where was it published?
Direct link added. Person born in 1930, Photo appears of his 30s. PD-India applies.
  • File:Raghunath Prasad RP Rastogi.jpg: Needs a pd US tag and to be reviewed to ensure the India pd tag is valid.
The publisher institution is of Dept. Science & Technology, Govt. of India, so GODL-India applies too. PD-US added.
  • File:Hari Gautam VC-BHU.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
Direct link added. GODL-India applies.
  • File:Prof. Y.C. Simhadri VC-BHU.png: Needs to be reviewed.
Direct link added. GODL-India applies.
  • File:Patcha Ramachandra Rao.jpg: Summary needs more information
Added as per available details on File.
  • File:Dr. Panjab Singh.jpg: Needs to be reviewed
Present at *.gov.in, GODL-India applies.
  • File:Prof. D.P. Singh Director NAAC Vice Chancellor Banaras Hindu University.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
Present at *.gov.in, GODL-India applies.
  • File:Girish Chandra Tripathi.jpg: Needs to be reviewed.
Present at *.gov.in, GODL-India applies.
  • File:Rakesh Bhatnagar 27th Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University.png: The listed source is another Wikipedia page, which is not a valid source. This needs to be fixed.
Fixed.
  • File:Sudhir K Jain Potrait.png: Needs to be reviewed.
Same photo as 1st in this list.
@Z1720 for your kind attention, please. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 05:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

The following photos have a GODL-India banner, but have not been marked as reviewed to ensure that they are compliant with this. This link has information on how to mark these images as reviewed. If you did not originally add the GODL-India banner, I think it is appropriate for you to mark them as reviewed.

  • File:Narendra Deva 1971 stamp of India.jpg
  • File:Triguna Sen 2010 stamp of India.jpg
  • File:Professor Amar Chand Joshi.jpg
  • File:Kl shrimali.jpg
  • File:Moti Lal Dhar.jpg
  • File:Professor Hari Narain.jpg
  • File:Raghunath Prasad RP Rastogi.jpg
  • File:Hari Gautam VC-BHU.jpg
  • File:Prof. Y.C. Simhadri VC-BHU.png
  • File:Dr. Panjab Singh.jpg
  • File:Prof. D.P. Singh Director NAAC Vice Chancellor Banaras Hindu University.jpg
  • File:Girish Chandra Tripathi.jpg
  • File:Sudhir K Jain Potrait.png

Also, in the chart, some of the images are sized with px. MOS:IMGSIZE recommends using upright instead, so I think these images should be changed to that designation. Z1720 (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Most (except a few) of the images have been uploaded by me only, so it would not be possible for me to review them. If you or anyone else wishes to review them, I would be glad to help in any query or concern.
I have used px to maintain uniformity in size as some images are tiny and some super big, so if we use upright, we will have to either calculate for each of them and reach the uniform size, or they would appear in a much less orderly manner. I think it would be COMMONSENSE to use px here.
Thanks for the prompt reply @Z1720. User4edits (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I am less familiar with FLC criteria concerning px vs upright. Testing out the code, I was roughly able to get the images to similar sizes with upright, though would have to experiment a little more to get it looking more uniform. Maybe one of the directors @Giants2008 and PresN: can determine if px is OK in this circumstance. Z1720 (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
It's fine when they're in a table like here; you don't want to do it for standalone images because people have their own default sizes set that it would override, but in a table you're able to set a set width/desired height for a column and then make the images fit. --PresN 18:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Considering the above, I'm willing to declare support based on image review alone. Z1720 (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Airship

General
  • There are a significant number of citations which need to be marked with the |url-status=dead parameter.
  • What is the purpose of the citations in the "Remarks" column where there are no remarks? All the ones I have looked at seem to be completely unnecessary.
I believe it was not so earlier, and was added to provide a reference for each office holder in previous comments. Nonetheless, they are standalone references rather than a general list. User4edits (talk) 05:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Per MOS:NUMERAL, numbers less than ten should be spelt out in letters.
Infobox
  • In general, too many parameters are unnecessarily used.
  • Why is the BYU flag specified to "fly atop vice-chancellor's car and office"? Can this be cited? I suspect not, so why is the caption not simply "Banaras Hindu University flag"?
I do not think we can find references specifically citing that. However, it is common knowledge backed by images. User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The citations for the "style" parameter do not support the current entry. A proper citation would state "XYZ is the style of address used by the vice-chancellor", not "[assorted collection of the use of a common abbreviation]".
  • The "Type" parameter is completely unnecessary. No, readers are not that unintelligent.
Vice-chancellor is not a universal position, it has been added to help readers from a different background. User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The "status" parameter means "does it still exist?", not "what is it?".
I do not find this on template page, so a reference citing this would be helpful. User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • One of the two citations for the acronym VC-BHU instead call it BHU V-C. Why has the former been chosen ahead of the latter?
The former is used officially on X by the organisation, and in other sources as well. User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • As the VC is only ex-officio a member (strictly speaking the chairperson) of the Executive Council, Academic Council, and Finance Committee, they should not be present in the "Member of" parameter.
Ex-officio means by the virtue of the position they are holding, not individually. I do not understand "only" here. (For example, president is ex-officio supreme commander of armed forces). Chairperson are anyway a member first (of any body which has members). Anyway, as per Chapter II BHU Act Article 14, 17, and 21, the VC is a member, and chairperson vide Chapter I of the same Act Article 7C (2) User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The "Reports to" paramter is not cited in the infobox or body.
This is derived from Visitor-Vice Chancellor relationship set in Article 5 BHU Act and User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The anchor for the Central Office in the Seat parameter is non-functioning.

 Fixed User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

  • The "(Visitor of the university)" is not necessary in the "Appointer" parameter"
That is to clarify that the President of India appoints in capacity of Visitor of Univ, and not Head of State. User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • For the term length parameter: a) see the MOS:NUMERAL point above b) "Second term of fresh appointment possible." is not intelligible English.
 Fixed User4edits (talk)
  • The "Precursor" parameter does not mean what you think it means (this is also apparent in the second paragraph of prose).
 Fixed User4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The "Deputy" parameter should only be used when the deputy position is notable enough to have an article of its own.
 FixedUser4edits (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

With that many issues with the infobox alone immediately apparent, I am going to oppose—I haven't even checked the prose or the list itself. Ping me if you are sure these issues and others have been fixed; I do not have the time to enter into a cumbersome and tiring WP:FIXLOOP. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

@AirshipJungleman29 you may want to see my replies above, Thanks, User4edits (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

List of Washington Commanders seasons

Notified: Jwalte04, WP:NFL, Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Washington Commanders subproject, WP:USA & WP:WPLIST

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:

  • 1. Prose: the prose is choppy (the opening sentence is self-referencing), the first paragraph especially could use a good rewrite
  • 2. Lead: there are also a ton of duplicate links in the lead. Some clarifications are needed (was their worst record based on total losses or winning percentage?)
  • 3b. Comprehensiveness: primary issue here, the list lacks necessary inline citations in the lead and within the table (the awards especially). Sources lack consistent formatting (dates especially) and there is too much of a reliance on "general references". Some sources appear to either be dead, out of date or unreliable.
  • 4. Structure: the notes and inline cites need to be split into separate sections.
  • Accessibility: the list lacks all accessibility features expected of WP:FL today, both in the table, the key and no alt text on the photo.

The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

List of current members of the Maryland House of Delegates

Notified: Marylandstater, Y2hyaXM, WikiProject Maryland

2007 FL which, unfortunately, has not stood the test of time. Concerns on the talk page have been met with silence. Firstly, the last paragraph of the lead is unsourced. The list is also tagged {no footnotes} and, indeed, uses general references. Overall, this shouldn't be very hard to rectify, but as it stands, this fails 3b and is not exemplar. (I'm also concerned about the very-near-total reliance on a single source, but that isn't any criterion I know of and it's perfectly reliable.) QueenofHearts 09:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

  • Remove: per nom. Please ping me if changes are made. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
    @Idiosincrático: I've improved the list and it isn't a slam-dunk removal candidate now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
    I've withdrawn my vote, but haven't conducted a review. Idiosincrático (talk) 13:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

List of Golden Martín Fierro Award winners

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is not comprehensive, its prose are weak and it is not kept up to date. It was promoted in 2014 and I feel no longer warrants featured list status. Lankyant (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

  • Remove: per nom. Please ping me if changes are made. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
  • At first glance, this isn't too bad compared to other FLRCs. Definitely needs to add the last few years, but I think it is otherwise fairly comprehensive, unless there are other details to this award that I am missing. (Which may be the case given that two of the three "current" holders aren't listed in the article?) Also, the article should probably move to Golden Martín Fierro Award, but I would suggest doing that after the FLRC closes. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
    Well, I guess I answered my own question, because I found this article that discusses radio and digital winners (assuming my basic high school Spanish and my browser's auto-translation are accurate). In that case, a delist may be more reasonable given the amount of content to be added. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)