Wikipedia:XfD Today

Shortcuts

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Speedy deletion candidates

Candidates for speedy deletion

Draft:Super Mario Paint 3D

Timisoara Award for European Values

Draft:Wellworking

Articles

< January 26	January 28 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

List of hospitals in Surat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The grouped hospitals must be notable together for some other reason than simply existing in Surat. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Lists, India, and Gujarat. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete not everything that can be listed needs to be listed on Wikipedia. Llajwa (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Amicus International Consulting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like most of the sources are actually press releases published on other news sites and podcasts. LinkedIn and the company website don't count, and a WP:BEFORE didn't turn up replacement sources. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Inffinito

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly routine coverage of events by the organization, no WP:SIGCOV or WP:NORG to denote for notability. nearlyevil 665 04:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 04:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Skillpointe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A lot of search results but it doesn't seem like there's any sigcov, mostly just press releases and non-RS. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Walter Love

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any sources beyond those covering the subject's passing. Fails WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665 04:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 04:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

KTOU-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oklahoma. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

KLHO-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oklahoma. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

KUOT-CD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oklahoma. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Joy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some of the article's sources talk about joy but some talk about happiness. Should the topics be separate or should this be turned back into a redirect to Happiness? If this article was kept, it would need to basically be remade from the ground up, but I don't know if it needs to be a separate page. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Les Éditions CEC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book publisher. Page appears like a LinkedIn profile; zero reliable sources; WP:ROTM. Fails WP:NCORP. Cabrils (talk) 04:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Barry Onouye

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Architecture, Engineering, Hawaii, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete: No coverage other than book listings on various sites, might have a pass at AUTHOR, but I can't find reviews. Oaktree b (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep: The page needs improvement but should be kept. This is an educator who has spent most of his professional career in architectural practice in an impactful way within the city of Seattle; see C7 of WP:NPROF. In addition his book with Kevin Kane, Statics and Strengths of Materials for Architecture and Building Construction; 3rd Ed.,(Prentice Hall, 2006), didn't go into multiple editions by accident - it's been used at lots of colleges and universities, which speaks to C4 of WP:NPROF. A distinguished chair and an annual studio have been named in his honor at the University of Washington, which are closely connected to C5 of WP:NPROF. See https://onouye.be.uw.edu/ and https://arch.be.uw.edu/people/barry-s-onouye/ and https://openpublishing.library.umass.edu/btes/article/id/1928/. Qflib (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Weak keep per Qflib - he's not exactly famous but his career has been impactful, and seems to squeak by the requirements in WP:PROF. Llajwa (talk) 21:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Emmanuel Khamis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Sudanese "politician" whose position is Acting Mayor of Juba city council. Seems at best WP:ROTM. Fails WP:NPOL, WP:ANYBIO. Cabrils (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Petrus Kilian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable South African soldier. Article contains 1 citation and would seem unlikely to have others. Appears WP:1E. Fails WP:GNG,WP:ANYBIO. Cabrils (talk) 03:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Isabel Leidig Building

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability criteria. WP:GEOFEAT makes clear that buildings on national heritage registers can be presumed to be notable. There is not such presumption for those on a state list like this one. That means WP:NBUILDING requires WP:SIGCOV - here there is the application for state listing, plus two single line mentions in other local sources. Melcous (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hugo Pingray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "semi-professional" card player, promotional, created by blocked account: fails WP:GNG Cabrils (talk) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Mohmil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a dictionary definition, which is prohibited per WP:DICTIONARY. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 04:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Keep. This seems to essentially be a part of speech in certain languages, like a verb or adjective, and I'm seeing a fair number of linguistic papers discussing them. Could easily be expanded with e.g. some discussion of how stemming algorithms handle mohmil words, there's two papers on that alone at a quick search. (I also suspect there's likely to be a lot more coverage in Urdu, but I'm too monolingual to confirm that.)— Moriwen (talk) 15:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Percy Parkes Building

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability criteria: WP:GEOFEAT applies to buildings on national historical heritage lists, this is on a state list, which means WP:NBUILDING applies and WP:SIGCOV is required. I do not believe the application for state heritage listing plus brief mentions in a coffee table book and in a local newsletter meet the standard for significant coverage in independent sources. Melcous (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Nikolay Atanasov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nikolay Atanasov

This biography of an Olympic athlete was created under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only reference is a database entry.

Draftify as nominator to allow six months to find significant coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Bulgaria. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment Would it not be easier to ask the creator directly for improvement when you don't even want it deleted? Anyway, a three-time Olympian, three-time World Championship participant, Balkan champion and nine-time national champion (in a country that holds a high level in athletics) meets WP:SPORTCRIT with the most flying of flying colours, so it's just a matter of finding the good stuff. Geschichte (talk) 10:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Actually, the article fails WP:SPORTCRIT, prong 5: "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources." Cbl62 (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Wallo Brands

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company doesn't seem to meet NCORP, I can't really find much actual news coverage of them. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Ling Xiaoyu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Look, I'm not opposed to using lists in articles. If they can say something tangible and of substance, they're worth citing. But that isn't the case here: the article overall is refbombed, with the vast majority of these being short references that aren't saying anything before quickly moving onto the next subject. Couple that with some review quips, and its definitely a mountain out of a molehill situation. It has all the hallmarks of Niemti's wikipedia work. Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Merge to List of Tekken characters, does not seem to have standalone notability or serious significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Merge to Characters of the Tekken series. There's a reference or two here that could be nice, but the bulk of this article is basically as nom describes. There's nothing substantial really being said about the character here, especially given how minor a lot of the commentary is. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Haji Muhammad Mohsin Government High School, Rajshahi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School fails NCORP. The Banglanews24 cite is a mere mention. Banglapedia says nothing about this school. The Ministry of Education cite is ROUTINE. The first academia.edu cite only mentions this school; the second says nothing at all about it. The Prothom Alo and Daily Campus are ok but I think that's too little for GNG. I worry this is a stealth advertisement, as most of the content is not cited. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bangladesh. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

@Chris troutman The second academia.edu cite has used for Reformed Madrasah Scheme. This school was included in that scheme. And Banglapedia cite has used for Commission on National Education (1958) and the school was also included that commission. Is it not normal not to mention the school name separately? Farhansnigdho (talk) 16:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, there was a reformed madrasah scheme. We need sources that are actually about the school, itself per WP:SIGCOV. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

@Chris troutman The sources is given for the scheme or commission which is mentioned in the article not for the school. This school was under that scheme or commission. -- Farhansnigdho (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd.

Logs: 2024-01 ✗ deleted ← 2024-01 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Complex/_Rational 03:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Nuvolo (Software Company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing any WP:SIGCOV or even many reliable sources at all on a WP:BEFORE. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep I can see coverage across multiple reliable sources but the article itself should be converted into a stub. Dympies (talk) 13:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

@Dympies: Can you find some examples of sigcov? I can add them to the article myself but I couldn't find any. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy delete: Full of WP:ORGTRIV published on Oct 2 and Oct 3, 2023. Article fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Should not have been moved to the main space after being declined four times. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Complex/_Rational 02:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Jake Hamilton

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not pass WP:BIO. The current sources are almost all WP:PRIMARY or not WP:INDEPENDENT. The rest are not WP:RELIABLE such as WP:BLOGS or written by contributors (i.e. WP:FORBESCON). When doing a before I mostly discovered that he wouldn't say the N-word when Samuel Jackson told him to which is a WP:NOTNEWS or WP:BLP1E concern. I also found a couple WP:INTERVIEWS. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, Film, Television, Entertainment, and Popular culture. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Per the extensive research by the nom. Not notable under any criteria. I would add the article was created by a WP:SPA. Newshunter12 (talk) 22:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

A. J. Healy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR. The only citations provided are reviews for the first book in a series, and most of the information on the author page is about his first book, Tommy Storm and the accompanying series. I have looked for other sources for reviews of the other books, as well as sources discussing Healy, but haven't found any. If sources can't be found, I recommend redirecting to his one notable book, Tommy Storm. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Ireland. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Tommy Storm and the Galactic Knights

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. I've searched for reviews on Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, and School Library Journal, as well as general searches on Google and Google Scholar, and haven't found any sources to meet notability guidelines. I would suggest redirecting to the author's page (A.J. Healy), at least for now. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Alexey Vladimirovich Kovalkov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advert of a Russian dietarian. Tagged since 2016. All references are advertising. - Altenmann >talk 01:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Joe Turner Classic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Joeykai (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Subject meets the WP:GNG with sources such as [[1]] and [[2]] Absolon S. Kent (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@Absolon: The sources you've cited don't come close to being SIGCOV of the Joe Turner Classic. I have an open mind, but we need far better than that if we are going to keep this. Cbl62 (talk) 17:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete: Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to show this meets the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Franciscan Bowl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Joeykai (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment. My search at Newspapers.com turns up hundreds of hits for pottery "Franciscan bowls" popular in the 1930s but not much on the football game. The best I found was this and this which are coverage of particular games lacking depth on the rivalry or trophy. We need better than that to satisfy NRIVALRY/GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Shulk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shulk, despite being basically the poster boy for Xenoblade Chronicles and and a major character on his own, doesn't seem to meet general SIGCOV thresholds for me. All of his Reception is sourced to reviews of the game- which, while not unusable, requires some sourcing beyond just the reviews- and to his Smash appearance (The latter of which barely classifies as commentary, with a lot of it boiling down to "He is a strong character") and the only other source I could find was an admittedly solid book source, which I'll link here. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Posthumanism_in_digital_culture/jjYTEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Shulk%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT115&printsec=frontcover Beyond the book, there is very little significant coverage of Shulk as an individual character. I feel a merge to Xenoblade Chronicles may be the best AtD, given most of the sourcing in the article is straight from reviews of that game. I'm unopposed to a future recreation, but Shulk as it stands right now is very lacking in terms of what's needed for a standalone article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Video games. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep as creator (though I wasn't notified?) Beyond the source already mentioned in the nomination, there's significant coverage literally in the article. Here's an entire lengthy article written about him. Sergecross73 msg me 01:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Apologies about the issue with the pinging. Didn't realize that Twinkle was sending it to the wrong person. In any case, I'd argue Shulk's coverage is a bit lacking, as it doesn't really illustrate that the character is notable himself. It's basically all tied to reviews of Xenoblade Chronicles and Smash, which as mentioned is pretty lacking. The reviews give good coverage to him, I agree, but it doesn't really illustrate why he should be a separate article, given how they're all focused on his role in that specific game. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Didn't see the source you linked when I replied, sorry about that. Either way, the article doesn't seem to be too much in terms of significant coverage, since it's just a summary of Shulk's appearance in Xenoblade with some admittedly solid developmental info. I don't think it's enough to salvage the article entirely, unfortunately. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
What are you talking about? We've got multiple detailed sources, and an article that is 100% sourced. That's all we need here. Sergecross73 msg me 01:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Could you clarify what you mean by multiple detailed sources? Do you mean in terms of conception, reception, or both? I'm just making sure I don't misinterpret your argument by accident here. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep: The nominator admits that the Posthumanism in digital culture source is solid. The engadget article is clearly independent and specifically about the character. A well-sourced article. Toughpigs (talk) 01:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The Engadget source may be about the character, but there's not really much being said in the article. It's basically just a summary of Shulk's appearance in Xenoblade Chronicles rather than any form of commentary of analysis. I don't believe it really qualifies as an independent source for SIGCOV in this case. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
That doesn't make any sense. Every aspect of the Engadget article is about Shulk, and it's not a short article. It's the definition of SIGCOV. Sergecross73 msg me 01:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
It is about Shulk, but it's not SIGCOV. This is a plot summary article, and I don't see any meaningful commentary or analysis in here. If I'm wrong and missed something, feel free to correct me, because I'd be happy to count it if it does. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
It's literally a third party source discussing the subject in significant detail. That's what the GNG requires. Whether or not you found the commentary personally meaningful is completely irrelevant. Sources detailing subjects is what we need. Sergecross73 msg me 02:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Just because it can be verified as existing does not mean it is inherently notable. There needs to be some form of impact shown via the character, whether that be via outside discussion or via a real-world impact. Something like the book source above does that: It's an outside source that actively discusses the character in a meaningful context. The Engadget source is merely a plot summary. While it's an outside source, it doesn't provide much for the article. Where would it be used? It can't be used for Reception. At most it would sub in for a source used in Conception. It doesn't add anything meaningful to the article. The reviews fall under a similar issue, as they analyze Shulk's role in the context of the game exclusively. The book source discusses Shulk's actions in the game, but uses these actions to analyze beyond the work in question. I'm not against plucking from reviews, as they can be used to great effect in an article if there's enough coverage on them. But if the only sources are reviews with only one additional source, then the subject is better off being covered as a part of the work being reviewed, not as a standalone article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

You have apparently missed the excellent "Conception and creation" section. Simply repeating "it's not SIGCOV" is not helpful. Toughpigs (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I definitely agree that Conception and creation is definitely the highlight of the article, but it definitely doesn't justify a split given the lacking Reception. Shulk isn't someone like Varan where the massive amount of behind-the-scenes information justifies the article's existence. There's some good stuff, but I don't think it's enough to justify a split from the main article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

The Kings of Frog Island

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. Searching the German music press only, I found reviews for the album II in Rockhard, Powermetal.de and Ox Fanzine as well as III in Metal.de. Furthermore we have Beatsperminute.com – every one I mentioned until now is reliable, as well as a miscellaneous assortment: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Geschichte (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Television Style Awards

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My WP:BEFORE can't find any independent coverage, cites mostly to primary sources and the article doesn't attempt to demonstrate notability, only a WP:DATABASE for the awards going from 2015-2017. I don't believe this meets the advice at WP:NAWARDS nor the policies of the GNG. The article lists current as 2024, but the sources website for that says that this is the first year these have been present. So I get the sense that this might even be the conflation of two different but similar events with the same generic name. I'll note that the page was previously deleted, it would be best to review the comments there as well: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Television Style Awards microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Lorensberga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A school for ages up to 13. Previously prod-nominated with the stated reasons being WP:MILL and failure of WP:GNG. Sure, it exists, but a level of detail beyond mentioning it in the article of the city seems excessive. Though the school has been involved in the political situation in the city, Ludvika, which is a haven for the far right. Geschichte (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Sweden. Deltaspace</substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local areaspan>⁴² (talk • contribs) 18:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to the city Ludvika. We very seldom keep primary (elementary) school articles, and almost always redirect to the school district or city. This school fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL, and no evidence has been provided of Wikipedia:NRVE, "substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area". — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

The Tej Gyan Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. Article orphaned for a decade. Sources are mostly WP:PRIMARY. Article is basically WP:PROMO. PepperBeast (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, India, and Maharashtra. PepperBeast (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Renate Da Rin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 18:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion; see edit summary in Special:Permalink/587416055, which restored the article per WP:REFUND/as a contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete. I couldn't find any significant coverage in WP:LIBRARY, Google Books, Google Scholar, or general web searches. Fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG. Jfire (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Prafulla Moharkar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:VICTIM, notable for only WP:ONEEVENT. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and India. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Sam Williams (record producer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to meet WP:NMUSICIAN. Maybe a redirect to Supergrass is in order? BuySomeApples (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, United Kingdom, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hoërskool Oosterland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NORG. Sources in article and found in BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Found listings, mentions, mill news, nothing meeting WP:SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 21:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and South Africa. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 22:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete I concur with the nominator, as there are scarce reliable sources available to substantiate notability. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Created in Jan 2024 so would prefer not to close as soft-delete, relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Files

Redirects

Templates and Modules

Template:France-book-stub

Template:France-book-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unproposed, improperly catted, unclear scope. Her Pegship (?) 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Australia-book-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unproposed, improperly catted, unclear scope. Her Pegship (?) 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Keep both. Scope seems pretty clear to me. Category can be fixed. What do you mean by unproposed? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
"Australia-related" could mean (a) published in Australia, (b) written by a person from Australia, (c) concerning the history of the country of Australia, (d) a biography of someone from Australia...etc. etc., thus the scope is not clear. Also, like the France-book-stub template, this template was not proposed or discussed at the stub sorting project, where the creator might have discovered that book stubs are mainly created by genre or date of publication, not by country. Her Pegship (?) 01:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Miscellany

Draft:2020 Furmula 1 World Championships

Wikipedia is not as web host for your fantasy formula one simulations. Whpq (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Wikipedia:XfD Today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:Political history of Ogun State

Category:Centuries in Ogun State

Category:Television in Tunisia by century

Category:Meena clans

Category:Assassinated politicians by method

Category:Fictional characters from Tijuana

Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1715

Category:Centuries in Sochi

Category:Murder committed by female minors

Category:5th-century Greek people by occupation

Category:16th-century Malay people

Category:10th-century Yemeni writers

Redirects

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review