美國憲法第六修正案
《美利堅合眾國憲法》第六修正案 (英語:Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution )簡稱「第六修正案 」(Amendment VI ),是著名的权利法案 的一部分,主要是保障诉讼中被告所应具有的权利。
内容
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. [1]
译文: 在一切刑事诉讼中,被告有权由犯罪行为发生地的州和地区的公正陪审团 予以迅速和公开的审判,该地区应事先已由法律确定;得知控告的性质和理由;同原告证人对质;以强制程序取得对其有利的证人 ;并取得律师 帮助为其辩护。
手写版的权利法案草案,1789年,截取了日后成为第六修正案的部分
註釋
參見
2009年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2009 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
2007年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2007 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
2006年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2006 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
2005年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2005 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
2003年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2003 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
2002年美國最高法院全體同意案例 (2002 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States)
外部連結
Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967)
Barker v. Wingo (1972)
Doggett v. United States (1992)
Betterman v. Montana (2016)
公開 條款
In re Oliver (1948)
Presley v. Georgia (2010)
公正陪審團條款
可行性
Cheff v. Schnackenberg (1966)
鄧肯訴路易斯安那州案 (1968)
Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas (1989)
公正
Reynolds v. United States (1878)
Glasser v. United States (1942)
Irvin v. Dowd (1961)
Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966)
Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968)
Ham v. South Carolina (1973)
Adams v. Texas (1980)
Wainwright v. Witt (1985)
Morgan v. Illinois (1992)
Skilling v. United States (2010)
McDonnell v. United States (2016)
發現事實
Walton v. Arizona (1990)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States (1998)
Jones v. United States (1999)
Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000)
Ring v. Arizona (2002)
Blakely v. Washington (2004)
Schriro v. Summerlin (2004)
United States v. Booker (2005)
Washington v. Recuenco (2006)
Cunningham v. California (2007)
Oregon v. Ice (2009)
Southern Union Co. v. United States (2012)
Alleyne v. United States (2013)
Hurst v. Florida (2016)
大小與一致
Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
Rassmussen v. United States (1905)
Williams v. Florida (1970)
Apodaca v. Oregon (1972)
Ballew v. Georgia (1978)
Burch v. Louisiana (1979)
Ramos v. Louisiana (2020)
鄰近條款
United States v. Dawson (1853)
Burton v. United States (1905, 1906)
彈劾判決
Tanner v. United States (1987)
Warger v. Shauers (2014)
Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado (2017)
資訊條款
Rabe v. Washington (1972)
對質條款
庭外陳述
Reynolds v. United States (1878)
Dowdell v. United States (1911)
Pointer v. Texas (1965)
Bruton v. United States (1968)
Frazier v. Cupp (1969)
Ohio v. Roberts (1980)
Crawford v. Washington (2004)
Davis v. Washington (2006)
Whorton v. Bockting (2007)
Giles v. California (2008)
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009)
Michigan v. Bryant (2011)
Bullcoming v. New Mexico (2011)
Williams v. Illinois (2012)
Ohio v. Clark (2015)
面對面對質 盤問的限制
Chambers v. Mississippi (1973)
選擇
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez (2006)
約定
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Johnson v. Zerbst (1938)
Betts v. Brady (1942)
Hamilton v. Alabama (1961)
吉迪恩诉温赖特案 (1963)
Anders v. California (1967)
Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)
Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973)
Scott v. Illinois (1979)
Pennsylvania v. Finley (1987)
Nichols v. United States (1994)
Alabama v. Shelton (2002)
無衝突
Glasser v. United States (1942)
律師幫助無效
Strickland v. Washington (1984)
Nix v. Whiteside (1986)
Lockhart v. Fretwell (1993)
Williams v. Taylor (2000)
Glover v. United States (2001)
Bell v. Cone (2002)
Woodford v. Visciotti (2002)
Wiggins v. Smith (2003)
Holland v. Jackson (2004)
Wright v. Van Patten (2008)
Bobby v. Van Hook (2009)
Wong v. Belmontes (2009)
Porter v. McCollum (2009)
Padilla v. Kentucky (2010)
Sears v. Upton (2010)
Premo v. Moore (2011)
Lafler v. Cooper (2012)
Buck v. Davis (2017)
Garza v. Idaho (2019)
無建議陳述
Massiah v. United States (1963)
Brewer v. Williams (1977)
美國本身法律代表
Faretta v. California (1975)
McKaskle v. Wiggins (1984)
Rock v. Arkansas (1987)
Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California (2000)
Indiana v. Edwards (2008)
全文 修正案
批准
待定
过期
拟议
平衡预算修正案
布莱恩修正案
布瑞克修正案
竞选财务改革修正案
基督教修正案
克里特登妥协
废除选举人团修正案
执政平等机会修正案
联邦婚姻修正案
禁止亵渎国旗修正案
人类生命修正案
卢德罗修正案
亲权修正案
自由修正案
学校祈祷修正案
单一主题修正案
受害者权利修正案
形成 条款 释宪 相关
The article is a derivative under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License .
A link to the original article can be found here and attribution parties here
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use . Gpedia ® is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd