Wikipedia:UAA
Usernames for administrator attention
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
- Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
- Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
- Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
- For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
- Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {Uw-username} or {Uw-coi-username} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
- Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
- Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.
This page was last updated at 17:14 on 7 February 2025 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
- THEOFFICIALRCP (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Arsesy8 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "arse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ewusieajoman Council (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redd revenge (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "revenge" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Zokkipaki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "paki" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- AnnonymousFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- OFFICIALturtIe0517 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I hate tropical cyclones (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "hate..." on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please only block user if the name actually refers to hatred of other people or groups of people. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Poopmok (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Iruma kum (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used k instead of c attempting to skip filter: CumFoo. Violating string: iruma cum" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- El guapo223e73yr74ty983478t4r2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- RARTLtd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(ltd|pty)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 16:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- The sigma of rizzlers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and offensive username. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 02:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. If there's something really offensive about this that warrants blocking without having edited, I'm not seeing it. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it either - what is supposed to be offensive about this? — The Anome (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. @331dot, @The Anome, @Nedia020415: Based on the definition of these words that are available online, it's definitely not a violation from my perspective. Does it likely indicate the person is immature? Sure, but it's not offensive or a violation in any way I'd say. I know 331dot already said wait til they edit, but I felt it better to take it farther and clarify that the name isn't offensive so that, if they do edit, the name isn't brought back here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Let's start a pool on when the first Skibidi, sigma, or rizzler passes RFA. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hey man im josh I concur. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think its a vandal. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Vandalism is handled at WP:AIV, but they haven't edited at all, never mind vandalism. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry @331dot. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am sorry if I disturbed you. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Vandalism is handled at WP:AIV, but they haven't edited at all, never mind vandalism. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it either - what is supposed to be offensive about this? — The Anome (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- CIAScompetitions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies shared use. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Per WP:ORGNAME. Tulsi 24x7 15:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Dareutodefeatmeinadebateratherthencensoringme (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 16:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)